My Top 5 Considerations for Democratic Candidates So Far

With Sherrod Brown deciding not to run for President, I’ve been taking a longer look at the other Democratic candidates. Like most of us, I consider how close their political views align with my own, their ability communicate their ideas and to inspire people to follow them, their skills as political strategists and their ability to pass legislation. The most important quality that I’m looking for is their ability to bridge the racial divide between many of the working class white communities that support Trump and the minority communities that are threatened by Trump. I look to the examples of Robert F. Kennedy and Jesse Jackson, both of whom were able to garner significant support among both working class white and minority communities in their Presidential campaigns in 1968 and 1988.

Right now, my top considerations are Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Kirsten Gillibrand and Amy Klobucher. I’m leaning towards Elizabeth Warren, but I like the other candidates as well. I don’t think there is such a thing as a perfect candidate. But I think there are good candidates out there who would make a good President. Here’s my early and somewhat superficial assessment of the candidates so far.

ELIZABETH WARREN
Strengths – I really like how much of a policy wonk Warren is. She has a strong grasp of the struggles of the middle class and has innovative policy prescriptions on how to solve the problems of economic inequality in our nation. She’s spent enough time in the Senate to have a realistic grasp on how Congress works. As a liberal, her views most closely align with my own. Liberals believe capitalism can be reformed, in contrast to democratic socialists, who are much more skeptical of capitalism.
Weaknesses – Her recent squabble with President Trump about her Native American ancestry points to my one big worry about Elizabeth Warren. Warren doesn’t seem to have learned the lesson that Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton learned in 2016: if you get caught up in an insult contest with Trump, Trump will win. If Warren gets caught up in answering Trump’s “Pocohantas” name-calling, people will be diverted from Warren’s superior grasp of policy.

BERNIE SANDERS
Strengths – Bernie is a principled man who has stuck to his convictions for decades, even when his views were unpopular and derided. He has been accurate about how our system has become more economically unequal, and how the middle class has struggled. Long before Trump criticized trade deals like NAFTA, Sanders was prescient in his criticisms on how NAFTA would devastate working class communities. I personally think our country’s political center has shifted too far to the Right in the past 40 years, so I admire how Bernie Sanders has moved our political discourse further to the Left.
Weaknesses – Bernie has big policy proposals, but does he have the political skills to convert those proposals into law? Sanders has been in Congress since the 1990s. When you compare Sanders to other progressive Senators and Representatives during the same period (like Ted Kennedy, Paul Wellstone, Barbara Boxer, Maxine Waters, etc….) who were able to pass significant legislation, Bernie’s record in passing significant progressive legislation has been relatively scant. If it seems like the Democrats can win back both houses of Congress, I’d be more willing to support Sanders. If I think the Democrats will only win majorities in only one house of Congress, I’m passing on Bernie.

KAMALA HARRIS
Strengths – Kamala Harris has good policy proposals, she does her homework on the issues, she has shown herself to be tough and incisive in her questioning of Trump’s nominees. I think her cautious and disciplined approach is the perfect foil to Trump’s more emotional and undisciplined approach. Harris’s caution makes her much less likely to fall into the trap that Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz fell in with trying to trade insults with Donald Trump. Kamala Harris is the candidate that I most want to see in a debate with Donald Trump.
Weaknesses – Harris has only been in the Senate for 3 years. I worry about her inexperience in weathering the inevitable right wing assaults, the frustrations that come with trying to pass anything in Congress with Mitch McConnell as Republican leader in the Senate. Does she have the political savvy to overcome the Republican opposition? Maybe, maybe not, I don’t know. If Harris becomes President, she’s going to have to rely on Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to pass her legislation. Does Harris have a good working relationship with both leaders? During the Obama years, Obama had a distant relationship with Pelosi and Harry Reid. Joe Biden had to act as a go-between with the Obama administration and the Democratic leaders in Congress. I don’t know Harris well enough to know what her relationships are like with the Democratic leaders.

KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND
Strengths – I have to admit that I don’t know Gillibrand as well as the other three candidates. But what I know about her, I like. She’s progressive on most issues, but she’s independent enough to break from progressive orthodoxy if she disagrees. She has enough experience in Congress to have a realistic view on what is politically possible and what is not possible. Like Harris, I like Gillibrand’s cautious and disciplined approach, which I think would work well when opposing Trump.
Weaknesses – I hate to say this, but Gillibrand seems kind of bland. Especially in a field with charismatic candidates like Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris, Gillibrand seems to lack a certain quality that would inspire people to want to fight for her ideas. Elizabeth Warren, for instance, is a nerdy policy wonk but she’s also a fierce fighter for what she believes and she has the ability to inspire others to fight for her causes. It may just be because I don’t know Gillibrand enough. She may have that quality.

AMY KLOBUCHER
Strengths – Of all the candidates, Amy Klobucher seems to most have that quality that I saw in Sherrod Brown, the ability to reach both the working class white communities that support Trump and the minority communities. When I attended the last editorial cartoonist convention in Sacramento, an editorial cartoonist that I respect recommended that I take a look at Klobucher. She’s an independent minded progressive. She has experience in the Senate. She has a common person personality that makes her approachable to everyday people.
Weaknesses – I have a similar worry with Klobucher that I have with Gillibrand: they both seem kind of bland. But I don’t know Klobucher very well either. If I get to know her better, maybe she will show a charisma and a fighting spirit that will inspire people to want to fight for the causes she believes in.

I think charisma is important in a leader, so long as the leader inspires people to fight for a cause and not get caught up in a cult-of-personality. Both John F. Kennedy and George H. W. Bush wanted Americans to be involved in civic activism for this country. But I think John F. Kennedy, with his charisma and his call to “ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country”, was more successful in inspiring young people to civic involvement than George H.W. Bush’s “Thousand Points of Light”. Kennedy was just more charismatic than Bush.

Advertisements

About angelolopez

I’ve wanted to be an artist all my life. Since I was a child I’ve drawn on any scrap of paper I could get a hold of. When I went to San Jose State University, I became more exposed to the works of the great fine artists and illustrators. My college paintings were heavily influenced by the humorous illustrations of Peter De Seve, an illustrator for the New Yorker magazine. I also fell under the spell of the great muralists of the 1930s, especially Thomas Hart Benton and Diego Rivera. I graduated with a degree in Illustration. Angelo Lopez has had illustrations published in Tikkun Magazine, the Palo Alto Daily News and Z Magazine. From April 2008 to May 2011, Angelo's cartoons were regularly published in the Tri-City Voice, a weekly newspaper that covers the Fremont, Hayward, Milpitas, Neward, Sunol and Union City areas in California. He does a political webcomic starring his cartoon character Jasper for the progressive blogsite Everyday Citizen. Since December 2011, Angelo does a regular weekly political cartoon for the Philippines Today, a Filipino American newspaper based in the San Francisco Bay Area. Since March 2013, he has also contributed cartoons to the Manila Mail, a Filipino American newspaper based in Washington D.C. Angelo is a member of the Sunnyvale Art Club, and the Northern California chapter of the Society of Children's Book Writers and Illustrators. During the 1990s, he was a member of the part-timer workers SEIU unit in the city of Sunnyvale. Angelo won the 2013, 2015 and 2016 Sigma Delta Chi award for editorial cartooning for newspapers with a circulation under 100,000. He has also won the 2016 RFK Book and Journalism Award for Editorial Cartoons. Angelo won first prize for the Best of the West contest in 2016 and third prize in 2017. Angelo is married to Lisa Reeber. They enjoy taking walks, watching movies and hanging out with their nieces.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s