Angelolopez’s Weblog

November 13, 2009

Jasper the Cat and the Political Cartoons for Everyday Citizen

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — angelolopez @ 2:43 am

In the early part of 2009, I began doing some longer webcomics for Everyday Citizen, a progressive activist website. I created a comic based on my pet cat Jasper that I use to try to explore longer political issues. I was influenced by the many alternative cartoonists and underground cartoonists that I’ve been checking out from the library. I’ve marveled how these cartoonists have been able to explore social issues through their comics, and it has inspired me to do the same. Here are some links to some of the longer cartoons that I have done for Everyday Citizen.

Jasper’s Day
Jasper Tackles Health Care
Jasper Protests the War
Jasper and the Economy
Jasper Sings a Protest Song
Jasper Meets a Poet
Jasper and the Detention Center
A Cartoon about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
A Cartoon about My Experience in an Evangelical Church
A Cartoon about Political Debate
A Cartoon On Gay Marriage

Cartoons For the Tri-City Voice July to September 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — angelolopez @ 2:26 am

On April 9, 2008, I began to do cartoons for the Tri-City Voice, a newspaper that covers the Milpitas, Fremont, and Union City areas in the San Francisco Bay Area. It’s been a dream come true for me to be a published cartoonist and I’ve really enjoyed thinking up of cartoons each week. Most of my cartoons are political cartoons, but I occassionally do cartoons of the local Bay Area scene and cartoons for the holidays.

The months of July through September were dominated by the debates on health care reform. The greatest point of contention between liberal Democrats and the Blue Dog Democrats and Republicans has been the inclusion of a public option that the government would provide for all Americans. In a one week period in July, Michael Jackson, Ed McMahon, Farrah Fawecett, and Billy Mays died. Protests broke out in Iran to protest irregularities in the vote count of that country’s presidential elections. Cory Aquino, former president of the Philippines, died after a prolonged fight with cancer.

To view the cartoons that I’ve done for the Tri-City Voice from July through September 2009, click the dates below. The cartoon is below the crossword puzzle.

Insurance Companies and the Uninsured September 30, 2009
Labeling Obama Socialist September 23, 2009
Keeping the Polar Ice Caps Cool September 16, 2009
Labor Day September 9, 2009
Facebook Addiction September 2, 2009
The Town Hall Meetings August 26, 2009
The Key to Health Care Reform August 19, 2009
The Passing of Cory Aquino August 12, 2009
Preparing for the Class Reunion August 5, 2009
Current Health Care July 29, 2009
News From Iran July 22, 2009
Battling for the Soul of the Republican Party July 15, 2009
The Week of Celebrity Deaths July 8, 2009
The Patron Saints of Home Repair July 1, 2009

Cartoons for the Tri-City Voice April to June 2009

On April 9, 2008, I began to do cartoons for the Tri-City Voice, a newspaper that covers the Milpitas, Fremont, and Union City areas in the San Francisco Bay Area. It’s been a dream come true for me to be a published cartoonist and I’ve really enjoyed thinking up of cartoons each week. Most of my cartoons are political cartoons, but I occassionally do cartoons of the local Bay Area scene and cartoons for the holidays.

In the months of April through June, the Obama administration began to try to live up to the promise of making changes to the direction that our country was going to. Obama chose Sonia Sotomayor as the first female hispanic nominee for the Supreme Court. Across the nation, newspapers were going out of business, as younger people used the internet to gather their news and circulation continued to drop. Ordinary people expressed outrage that corporations and banks that accepted federal bailouts used part of that money to pay bonuses to their executives and employees. Obama tried to start negotiations with Russia to reduce the number of nuclear weapons that each side has. The federal government used stress tests to assure the public that the top banks were healthy enough to withstand further downturns in the economy. In local news, the communication lines of Santa Cruz and Los Gatos were shut down for a day when someone went underground and cut a few wires in a cable line. The California budget faced major cuts in education and social services as the recession severely cut the income to the state government.

To view the cartoons that I’ve done for the Tri-City Voice from April through June 2009, click the dates below. The cartoon is below the crossword puzzle.

Swine Flew June 24, 2009
Customers Wanted June 17, 2009
Testing Sotomayor June 10, 2009
Cutting the California Budget June 3, 2009
Worrying About Gay Marriage May 27, 2009
The Bank Stress Tests May 20, 2009
Swine Flu and Bull Markets May 13, 2009
Obama and Change May 6, 2009
Corporate Bonuses April 29, 2009
Cutting the Communication Networks April 22, 2009
Taming Nuclear Weapons April 15, 2009
Saving the Chronicle April 8, 2009
The Tri-City Voice April 1, 2009

November 12, 2009

Cartoons for the Tri-City Voice January to March 2009

On April 9, 2008, I began to do cartoons for the Tri-City Voice, a newspaper that covers the Milpitas, Fremont, and Union City areas in the San Francisco Bay Area. It’s been a dream come true for me to be a published cartoonist and I’ve really enjoyed thinking up of cartoons each week. Most of my cartoons are political cartoons, but I occassionally do cartoons of the local Bay Area scene and cartoons for the holidays.

During the first 3 months of 2009, the biggest news was that Barack Obama was inaugurated as our first African American President. The economy kept on its downward spiral. In response, the federal government authorized a $700 billion stimulus package, to stabilize the banks, to start public works programs, and to help states who were facing shortfalls in their budgets. For several weeks, the Israelis and Hamas battled in Gaza, as many innocent lives were caught in the crossfire. Meanwhile, in Oakland, several passengers in a Bart train took pictures of a security guard killing Oscar Gant. California braced for another year of drought as the winter rains once again fell short of what the state needed.

To view the cartoons that I’ve done for the Tri-City Voice from January to March 2009, click the dates below. The cartoon is below the crossword puzzle.

In China We Trust March 25, 2009
Drug Addiction March 18, 2009
The California Drought March 11, 2009
Obama’s Housing Plan March 4, 2009
News of Jessica Simpson February 25, 2009
The Federal Stimulus February 18, 2009
The Federal Stimulus From Two Viewpoints February 11, 2009
Hillary Diplomacy February 4, 2009
Bart Security January 28, 2009
Obama Inaugural January 21, 2009
Brokering Peace Between the Israelis and Palestinians January 14, 2009
Winter Sleep January 7, 2009

November 10, 2009

Cartoons for the Tri-City Voice November to December 2008

On April 9, 2008, I began to do cartoons for the Tri-City Voice, a newspaper that covers the Milpitas, Fremont, and Union City areas in the San Francisco Bay Area. It’s been a dream come true for me to be a published cartoonist and I’ve really enjoyed thinking up of cartoons each week. Most of my cartoons are political cartoons, but I occassionally do cartoons of the local Bay Area scene and cartoons for the holidays.

During November, Barack Obama was elected President, which caused me great joy. A multitude of propositions were in the California ballot, chief among them being Proposition 8, which would ban gay marriages. The economy worsened, as banks stopped lending money and housing foreclosures began a precipitous rise. In December, the California budget was in a crisis, as the Democrats and Republicans in the legislature could not come up with a compromise to pass a budget on time.

To view the cartoons that I’ve done for the Tri-City Voice from November to December 2008, click the dates below. The cartoon is below the crossword puzzle.

After the Holidays December 31, 2008
Lose Weight Fast December 24, 2008
December Unemployment December 17, 2008
The California Budget Crisis December 10, 2008
Some Christmas Gifts Are Greater Than Others December 3, 2008
A Vegan Thanksgiving November 26, 2008
The Home Foreclosure November 19, 2008
Facing Economic Challenges November 12, 2008
Voting November 5, 2008

Cartoons for the Tri-City Voice August to October 2008

On April 9, 2008, I began to do cartoons for the Tri-City Voice, a newspaper that covers the Milpitas, Fremont, and Union City areas in the San Francisco Bay Area. It’s been a dream come true for me to be a published cartoonist and I’ve really enjoyed thinking up of cartoons each week.

At around late August and early September, I began doing cartoons that had to do with the national news. During this time I was watching the Olympics, and the Presidential race really began to heat up. In October the economy began its precipitious slide. All of these events made my cartoons shift more towards political subject matter, and I found that I enjoyed doing political cartoons.

To view the cartoons that I’ve done for the Tri-City Voice from August to October 2008, click the dates below. The cartoon is below the crossword puzzle.

Taking Care of Nader October 29, 2008
Wall Street Down October 22, 2008
Worshipping Wall Street October 15, 2008
The Economic Rollercoaster October 8, 2008
Before the Fall October 1, 2008
McCain Palin September 24, 2008
Chasing Hillary Voters September 17, 2008
The Political Conventions September 10, 2008
Talking About the Olympics September 3, 2008
The Funeral August 27, 2008
Watching the Olympics August 20, 2008
The Birds and the Bees August 13, 2008
Tight Parking August 6, 2008

November 1, 2009

My Time in the Alternative Press Expo 2009

I’ve always loved comics. As a kid, I’d drive my mom nuts drawing Charlie Brown and Snoopy on any scrap of paper that I could find. Those old Peanuts comics gave me a lifetime love of cartoons of all types, and it instilled a desire to be a cartoonist. Two weeks ago, a friend and fellow cartoonist Greg Beda gave me a last minute invitation to visit the Alternative Press Expo 2009, which was taking place this year in the Concourse in San Francisco. I had already been invited by some friends for Saturdays sessions, but had to work that day. I was planning to do the laundry and nap on Sunday, but since Greg had an exhibit at APE 2009, I decided to attend. It was the first time I had met so many cartoonists and it was a great experience.

The Alternative Press Expo was in a huge hallway, with cartoonists sitting behind a table, with their comics and self-promo materials available for people to look at. The different range of cartoonists included superhero comics, autobiographical comics, satirical comics and social commentary comics. I think one of the things that surprised me was the large contingent of lesbian comic artists in the expo.

Some of the comics were slick and were professionally produced. Other comics were more rough, with a raw drawing style and produced by photocopies and handstaples. I loved looking at all the different styles of comics, and the rawer comics were especially daring and experimental. Being around these cartoonists made me feel more underground.

I tried to talk to each cartoonist and ask them questions about their art and the influences on their style. Some cartoonists were chatty and loved to talk about their art. Some were more shy. They all seemed grateful when someone takes the time to look at their comics and read the comics for a couple of minutes.

The first cartoonist that I met was in the expo was Stephen Notley , the creator of the comic Bob the Angry Flower. He was a very friendly man, even if he looked odd with a flower on his head. Bob the Angry Flower is featured in the cartoonist collection by Ted Rall called Attitude 2: The New Subversive Alternative Cartoonists . Bob the Angry Flower started up in 1992 in Stephen Notley’s university days when he did a weekly comic strip called The Germ. Notley’s subjects range from political subjects to stories about love and relationships. During the build-up to the invasion of Iraq, Bob the Angry Flower was especially scathing of the Bush administration. When asked in Attitude 2 about his politics, Notley replied:

“I guess I’m a libertarian-socialist-technocrat. I have a mess of seemingly contradictory political beliefs that I’m always struggling to resolve. On the one hand I’m a giant believer in freedom, as much freedom as possible in the political and social spheres. But economically I operate from the assumption that we all get more out of society than we put whether you’re a beggar on the street or Bill Gates, and it behooves us to take notice of how much of our wealth we owe to other people, and that further more, we can all get better results and do things more efficiently if we recognize that there is a common good and muster up the responsibility to pay for it through taxes.”

Alexander Shen was another cool cartoonist that I met. He does a comic called Robot in the City , which is about a robot named Ritz and his adventures in a vast city. In his website, the comic is described as such:

“Ritz the Robot doesn’t know how he wound up in this city. All he knows is that his heart is pure, his imagination is wild and humans think he looks like Abraham Lincoln (that’s how he landed that job as a barista afterall). He befriends a local art student, Elite, and they begin to learn that the vastness of the big city can be close if you have the right friends with you.”

Alexander was a nice person to talk to. He was very eager to get me to read his comics and we talked briefly about his comic. He’s been doing comics and illustrations since 2005, working with Flying Bears Inc., Play Jam Inc., Comcast Spotlight, Renkoo, VooDoo Baby and Indelible Graphics and Design. His work has also been featured in such publications as The Heuristic Squelched and Hyphen Magazine. For his art, Alexander uses pen and paper, Adobe Photoshop and CorelDraw.

I had a long conversation with Vernon Smith, the co-creator with his wife Karen Chen of the comic Dexter Breakfast. Dexter is this fury wombat cowboy, similar in looks to Walt Kelly’s Pogo. We spent most of our time talking about the APE 2009. I mentioned that this was my first time in an expo with so many cartoonists, and Vernon talked about his experiences with these sort of cartoonist gatherings. He had come from New Orleans and had been working on Dexter Breakfast since 2005.

Ted Washington isn’t a cartoonist, but a poet and a wonderful pen and ink artist. He started publishing his poems and illustrations and found it so enjoyable, he began Puna Press to publish other artists and poets that he liked. I looked at his artwork and thought his pen and ink portraits were wonderful and very moody and reflective. He is from San Diego, and he talked about the vital poetry scene in that area. He frequently takes part in events where he speaks his poetry out loud. It sounds like a fun event. He was a very friendly person and was very generous with his time with talking to me and to other people about his poetry and art.

Keith Knight is another friendly person and one of the cartoonists I most wanted to meet in the expo. He is the creator of two wonderful cartoons, The K Chronicles and (Th)ink and he is the subject of a segment of SPARK , a Bay Area Public Television show dedicated to artists in the San Francisco Bay Area. I first learned about him in Ted Rall’s book Attitude 2 and emailed him once for advice on cartooning. He emailed me back and gave me some good advice on cartooning. While I was there, we talked about the cartooning field and he suggested various political cartoonists who were attending APE 2009 that I should talk to. I came back to his table later in the afternoon to buy his The Complete K Chronicles but he had left his table, I’m guessing for lunch, so I’ll have to get his book at a local bookstore.

Though many have a stereotype that most cartoonists are guys, there were a lot of women cartoonists in the expo. Walking through the convention I met a woman who created a comic called Le Menagerie. I didn’t catch her name, but she was a very good cartoonist. She was busy painting quick pictures in watercolor to sell to passerby people, and they were very good sketches of characters from her Le Menagerie comic. Right next to her was Elenore Tocyznski and her comic Brain Crease. Elenore was busy inking a comic page while people looked over her comic. I looked over and loved her sketchy thin line pen and ink style. I didn’t have as many long conversations with the women cartoonists as with the male cartoonists, but their work was just as good. Many of their works seem more autobiographical and they delved more into social commentary.

One of the comics that I bought at the convention was Susie Cagle’s comic Nine Gallons. “Nine Gallons” chronicles Cagle’s experience working in a food kitchen for Food Not Bombs, an organization founded in 1988 that used otherwise wasted food to make vegan and vegetarian food for the homeless. There are more than 400 chapters of Food Not Bombs serving vegetarian food in 1,000 cities around the world and they also protest war, poverty and the destruction of the environment. Cagle’s comic is an honest portrayal of her interactions with her homeless friends and the various people who help in the kitchen to make meals for Food Not Bombs. Reading the comic, I got a sense of the sadness and outrage that Cagle feels for the plight of the homeless and the growing numbers of people who need the food that Food Not Bombs serves.

Another comic that I bought that I enjoyed is Mr. Moritz and the Machine by Nick St. John. I didn’t get any chance to talk to the cartoonist, but his cartoon was a very sweet and melancholy little comic. It is about a lonely inventor who mysteriously lost his wife and son and was working on an invention to bring his loved ones back.
It looked like the kind of comic that one photocopied and stapled on one’s own, but it was also an elegant cartoon. I wish I had a chance to talk to the cartoonist.

The reason that I was at the expo was a last minute invitation of my friend, cartoonist a href=”http://atomicbearpress.com/2006/02/28/greg-bedas-wot-is-life/”> Greg Beda. We met in college as cartoonists for the school newspaper in the 1980s and we’ve kept in touch since then. Greg has gone to many of these cartoonist gatherings over the years, selling his comic books “Zeke and Goulash” and “Postmodern Anxst”. His comics are these wonderfully individualistic comics that deals with psychology, philosophy and personal relationships. He’s built up a small but loyal following and is well known among the many cartoonists that I’ve met. We didn’t talk much that day, but I thank Greg for giving me that email invitation on Saturday.

One of the funnest conversations that I had was with Tom Manning, the cartoonist who created the comic Runoff. Runoff has a beautiful graphic black and white artwork and it about the mysterious goings on in this town where a group of people get killed. Tom Manning’s comic has gained a cult following among filmmakers like Guillermo Del Toro and Nick Nunziato, who admire the eery atmosphere and strong story telling. Guillermo Del Toro wrote of Runoff:

“Tom Manning has created a world that is as bizarre as it is recognizable. As scary as it is moving.”

I asked Tom about his influences and he mentioned Dave Sim’s comic Cerebus. I had seen Cerebus when I was a kid in the comic stores, and deeply admired the crosshatched artwork, but I didn’t pay much attention to the stories. Manning deeply admired the storytelling of Cerebus, explaining how Dave Sim interweaved philosophical and religious concepts into the plots of his stories. I recommended that he read Matt Wagner’s comic Grendel. I mentioned that I was a comic collector in the 1980s, but had to quit during my college years as the price of comics started to rise and I had to spend my money on supplies for my art classes. Part of the reason for my talking to cartoonists was to catch up what I missed in the comic book scene during the 1990s and 2000s.

The biggest excitement for me was to meet two great political cartoonists, Ted Rall and Stephanie McMillan. I learned about these two cartoonists a few years ago when I was in Powells Bookstore in Portland and I bought Ted Rall’s 3 books on alternative cartoonists called Attitude: The New Subversive Political Cartoonists. It was when I started doing political cartoons for the Tri-City Voice and loved the edgy satire of the new cartoonists. When I finally met the two, though, I really got nervous and tongue tied, and I smacked myself in the head when I thought of the conversations with the two later on. I managed to ask some simple questions about the political cartooning field and they both were very patient and nice in answering (even if they seemed a bit confused about what I was trying to ask.

Ted Rall is a syndicated political cartoonist for the Universal Press Syndicate and has cartoons in such alternative weekly newspapers as the Village Voice, the Washington City Paper and the San Diego Reader. Rall was inspired to become a cartoonist after meeting pop artist Keith Haring in a New York subway in 1986. Rall’s cartoons try to live up to the tradition of 19th century cartoonist Thomas Nast, who viewed political cartoons as a vehicle for change. He traveled to Afganistan to cover the war in that country, and the Nation magazine felt that his writings were among the best war reporting on the Afganistan war.

Stephanie McMillan is the cartoonist/activist who created the radical comic stripMinimum Security. I admire her as a cartoonist who has taken part in direct activism, demonstrating and getting arrested for anti-war, abortion rights and immigrant rights issues. McMillan named her comic strip “Minimum Security” reading about a man who had been released from prison who remarked, “I’m still not free; I’m just in minimum security.” Her radical politics inspires in McMillan a desire to use her cartoons as an agent for social change. In the book Attitude: The New Subversive Political Cartoonists, Stephanie McMillan said about the purpose of her political cartoons:

“Everyone has a point of view that is the foundation of what they write or say even if it isn’t expressed overtly. The corporate agenda underlies mainstream news. One of the great things about political cartoons is that we don’t have to hide what we really think. Informed by our basic outlook, we try to expose truths as we see them. At least we’re able to be honest about that, unlike many mainstream journalists who’d be fired if they tried.

As for people whose art or writing is their main form of political activity, what’s wrong with that? It’s taking a stand and a whole lot better than doing nothing. Making a pointed statement or exposing injustice or helping people laugh at forces they’re afraid of- this is a very valuable service that challenges people to take a deeper look at what’s going on. There are a million ways to fight the system. People do need to be out in the streets, but they also need commentators and artists who cheer them on and inspire them.”

This quote is especially gratifying to me, as I have similar aspirations for my own cartoons. I admire Stephanie McMillan’s ability to combine her art and her activism, and it follows a long tradition of political artists from Diego Rivera to John Sloan to Jules Feiffer. In the March 2009 issue of Z Magazine, talks about the roots of her grassroots activism:

“All of the political work I’ve done during my life, which has included working against police brutality and imperialist war, for immigrant rights, and protecting abortion clinics, has been with the underlying awareness that one system- structured to increase the wealth of a very few- is oppressing all the rest of us in countless different ways. I worked on issues that I thought revealed this reality and could potentially connect with other struggles to form an all-encompassing revolutionary movement. To eliminate this oppressive system, we need to attack it from every angle, and at the same time understand that we, in different struggles, have a common enemy.”

Though I consider myself more a reformer than a revolutionary, I too want my comics to reflect my left wing views and to be an agent for change. From the APE 2009, I got out of it a sense of the integrity and perserverance of the many cartoonists who are doing what they love to do. I hope people do not mind my shameless self-promotion of my own cartoons, but I am grateful to be in Everyday Citizen and that they allow me to show my longer cartoons here. I created a comic based on my pet cat Jasper, that I use to try to explore longer political issues. Here are some links to some of the longer cartoons that I have done for Everyday Citizen.

Jasper’s Day
Jasper Tackles Health Care
Jasper Protests the War
Jasper and the Economy
Jasper Sings a Protest Song
Jasper Meets a Poet
A Cartoon about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
A Cartoon about My Experience in an Evangelical Church
A Cartoon about Political Debate
A Cartoon On Gay Marriage

October 18, 2009

Going to a vigil

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , — angelolopez @ 1:05 pm

Over the years, I’m ashamed to say, I’ve been somewhat of an arm chair liberal. I’ve talked a lot with my friends about politics and social change, and I’ve complained a lot about the things that are wrong with our society. Yet I haven’t really volunteered much to try to make any changes in our society. My brother and his wife put me to shame in this sense. Over the years, they have taken part in protests for immigrant rights and to fight the invasion of Iraq, and they are now working with the Coalition for Clean and Safe Ports to reduce pollution in the Ports of southern California. Right now they are working on a postcard campaign to persuade local politicians and Congress to support the Clean Trucks program. Attached is the copy of the postcard and here is the website for more information about the Coalition: http://www.cleanandsafeports.org/. I deeply admire them for their activism and willingness to get involved to try to improve their community and their country. I did a cartoon for Everyday Citizen about my cartoon character Jasper taking part in a protest.

Last week I decided to attend my first vigil. It was a vigil on health care reform on September 2, 2009 at the corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Winchester Road in San Jose, California. I went with my friend Dave, who officiated my wedding with Lisa 4 years ago, and is a passionate liberal and a former nurse. When I was researching health care reform to try to form an opinion, I would ask people that I knew in the health care field what their opinions were. Dave has definite opinions of the health care debate.

It was a fun vigil. Several people were there for the first time, and I think everyone was invigorated to meet other people who shared the same passion for health care reform. During the vigil, a large group of people lined themselves at the corner of the street and waved signs at passing cars. If the cars approved of the message of universal health care, they would honk their horns. At the same time, the organizer of the event would allow various individuals to go to the microphone and tell of their own individual stories about their experiences being sick and the financial toll that they suffered. As the night encroached, we lighted candles.

I was amazed at how many cars honked their horns in support of health care reform. A lady next to me, who participated in past vigils protesting the war in Iraq, mentioned that there were far more cars honking their horns for health care reforms than honked their horns for peace. The people who were participating in the vigil were very diverse, with many different nationalities, age groups, and an even mix of men and women. Dave and I met unexpectedly met some friends whom we hadn’t seen in over a year.

A highlight for me was in meeting Father Bill Leininger. When I first talked to him, he mentioned that in the past he had marched with Cesar Chavez and had met Dorothy Day, and I was really impressed with him. After the vigil was over, I mentioned this priest in my facebook site and a friend told me that Father Leininger is a pioneer clergy in the social protest movements of the past 40 years. I went on the internet and found that in recent years, Father Leininger has joined in vigils in support of protests in support of janitors at Cisco System, to support WalMart employees, and to fight for immigrant rights. Last May, SIREN (Services, Immigrant Rights, & Education Network), 2nd Annual Fundraiser gave Father Leininger their Advocate Award for his years of support of immigrant rights. After finding this out, I wish I had gotten a chance to talk to Father Leininger more.

If you want to know more about what activists are doing around the country, this website, Crossleft, is a good source of information. The Crossleft bloggers are all activists in various progressive Christian causes and are good sources for progressive action. Two magazines are also excellent sources. One is the Catholic Worker. Founded in the depths of the Great Depression by Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin, the Catholic Worker chronicles the work of a progressive Catholic movement founded by Day and Maurin to help the poor and fight for peace.

In the August-July 2009 Catholic Worker, Jenny Thomas wrote an article about a group of Catholic Workers who went to a Gaza border crossing to deliver $17,000 of medical supplies to a hospital in Gaza. The members of the Catholic worker team, Beth Brockman, Mark Colville, Brenna Cussen, Colin Gilbert, Scott Schaeffer-Duffy, and Jenny Thomas, went to the Dheished Refugee Camp in Bethlehem, the Palestinian farmers cut off from any water supply, and the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions.

Ric Rhetor wrote an article about the New Sanctuary movement and a vigil they held on July 7 outside the Federal Court in New York. It was for Roxroy Salmon and his appeal to stay in the country. RoxRoy is an organizer at Families for Freedom and a member of the New Sanctuary Coalition. Because of minor drug convictions from over 20 years ago, he is facing removal proceedings. The court gave Roxroy an order of deportation, but his lawyer has filed for a deferred action.

Z Magazine is an independent magazine based in Boston. Z Magazine has a radical point of view and chronicles the efforts of activists to make this world a better place.

In the July/August 2009 issue of Z Magazine, there was an article mentioning the closing of Northland Poster Collective after 30 years of creating art, slogans, posters, bumper stickers, t-shirts, poems and quotes for unions, grassroots activists, and social justice movements. The organization was an activist organization and art group, and it provided such slogans for picket lines as “The Labor Movement: The Folks That Brought You The Weekend”, “Friends Don’t Let Friends Cross Picket Lines”, and “Unions: The Anti-Theft Device For Working People”. The troubles that Northland Poster Collective have faced are being faced by all left wing media center.

In the September 2009 issue of Z Magazine, nine activists were arrest in August in Fort McCoy in Tomah, Wisconsin, for protesting U.S. wars in Iraq and Afganistan and for the continuing U.S. possession of nuclear weapons. These nine activists were also commemorating the anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima in August 6 and Nagasaki in August 9. Four members of the group were taken to Madison where they faced federal trespass charges.

One of my favorite books is Grace Paley’s book, Just As I Thought is chronicles her years of activism against war and racism, and for her years of teaching. I’ve admired the humorous and down-to-earth perspective that Paley brings to her recollections of protesting the Vietnam War and the various vigils against nuclear weapons. In an interview with Meredith Smith and Karen Kahn, Paley talked about the importance of Americans to use their privileges to fight for social causes.

“But we were just talking about civil disobedience. Some people think it’s an elite act because some of us have privileges of white skin or maybe jobs we won’t lose the minute we are arrested. Well, it’s true that people of color are treated worse in prison than white women. They are. (Of course, the great civil disobedience movements- King, Gandhi- were not exactly white). When white women (or men) use the argument- therefore nobody should do it- I don’t understand them. It seems to me that privilege is obligation, that if it’s easier to go to jail, so to speak, or more possible, then direct actions that may lead to arrest are exactly what we ought to undertake when that is what’s called for.

It’s sort of like having democratic rights and not using them. It’s a totally different subject but people will always come to you when you’re giving out leaflets and say, ‘You wouldn’t be able to do that in Russia.’ So therefore you shouldn’t do it here? Well, of course you have an obligation to push the privileges of democracy, to push and extend them everywhere. And people who can should do so. We also have to be willing to divide up the work without feeling that some folks are being snotty about it or braver. They’re not braver. For instance, when my children were babies, I was a lot more cautious. We much investigate, imagine, press the limits of nonviolent action.”

My favorite book of activism is Howard Zinn’s recollection You Can’t Be Neutral On A Moving Train. Zinn’s book chronicles his life of activism, from the time he was a teacher at an black women’s school in Spellman College in the 1950s, and his work in the Civil Rights movement and the anti-war movement. He wrote something that describes the importance of vigils and protests and petition writing in the cause of social change. He wrote:

“Consider the remarkable transformation, in just a few decades, in people’s consciousness of racism, in the bold presence of women demanding their rightful place, in a growing public awareness that homosexuals are not curiosities but sensate human beings, in the long-term growing skepticism about military interventions despite the brief surge of military madness during the Gulf War.

It is that long-term change that I think we must see if we are not to lose hope. Pessimism becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; it reproduces itself by crippling our willingness to act.

There is a tendency to think that what we see in the present moment we will continue to see. We forget how often in this century we have been astonished by the sudden crumbling of institutions, by extraordinary changes in people’s thoughts, by unexpected eruptions of rebellion against tyrannies, by the quick collapse of systems of power that seemed invincible.

The bad things that happen are repetitions of bad things that have always happened- war, racism, maltreatment of women, religious and nationalist fanaticism, starvation. The good things that happen are unexpected.

Unexpected, and yet explainable by certain truths which spring at us from time to time, but which we tend to forget: Political power, however formidible, is more fragile than we think. (Note how nervous are those who hold it) Ordinary people can be intimidated for a time, can be fooled for a time, but they have a down-deep common sense, and sooner or later they find a way to challenge the power that oppresses them.

People are not naturally violent or cruel or greedy, although they can be made so. Human beings everywhere want the same things: they are moved by the sight of abandoned children, homeless families, the casualties of war; they long for peace, for friendship and affection across lines of race and nationality.

Revolutionary change does not come as one cataclysmic moment (beware of such moments!) but as an endless succession of surprises, moving zig-zag towards a more decent society.

We don’t have to engage in grand, heroic actions to participate in the process of change. Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can transform the world.”

The Founding Fathers and Slavery Part 2

As Flag Day and July 4 approach, it is wise to consider the Founding Fathers and their accomplishments and failures. One of the things that these men have been criticized for in recent years, and one that many in the Left make about them, is that many of the Founding Fathers were slaveholders and that they did not eradicate slavery. Though I agree that the existence of slavery is one of the great stains in this nation’s history, I think it is wrong to stereotyp the Founding Fathers as being uncaring towards slaves. I wrote a previous blog about the Founding Fathers grappling with the issue of slavery and thought I’d write a followup. Though I am to the left of the political spectrum, the criticisms of many of the Left towards the Founding Fathers has bothered me. The early leaders did try to abolish slavery, but their fears of Southern secession eventually doomed those efforts.

From the 1770s to 1780s, several people developed plans as possible ways of abolishing slavery. Thomas Jefferson developed a plan of gradual abolition that featured an end to the slave trade, the prohibition of slavery, and the establishment of a date in which newly born children of slaves would be free. Prominent Virginians Fernando Fairfax and St. George Tucker submitted plans on the freeing of slaves: Tucker presented “A Dissertation on Slavery: With a Proposal for the Gradual Abolition of It, in the State of Virginia” to the Virginia Legislature in 1796 and Fairfax developed his “Plan for Liberating the Negroes within the United States” in 1790. All of these plans were similar in that they wanted the abolition of slaves to be gradual, they wanted the government to compensate the slave owners for the lost property, and they wanted to colonize the freed slaves in a seperate place from the white society.

One of the great criticisms of the gradual abolition plans that Southern critics pointed out is that the federal government didn’t have enough money to compensate the slaveowners and transport the freed slaves to other lands. Ellis notes in his book Founding Brothers though that a gradual abolition plan would spread the cost of freeing the slaves over several decades as only a percentage of slaves would be freed over one time. St. George Tucker’s plan would spread the cost of freeing the slaves over a century, making a gradual abolition plan more financially feasibly.

The great problem of any abolition plan would be the threat of Southern secession. John Adams felt that any abolition plan would have to be led by enlightened Virginians like Thomas Jefferson and George Washington who were against slavery and might be able to press their fellow Southerners to adopt an abolition plan. Joseph Ellis wrote in his book American Sphinx that in the mid 1780s and before, Jefferson was a strong advocate for the abolition of slavery. In 1769 Jefferson proposed unsuccessfully that the Virginia House of Burgess emancipate the slaves of Virginia. In 1778 he successfully passed a bill through the Virginia legislature for the banning of future slave importation to Virginia. Jefferson authored on April 1784 a proposal to the Continental Congress that would’ve abolished slavery in the Northwestern Territory of the U.S. that failed to pass by a single vote. When Jefferson’s 1784 proposal failed to pass by one vote, he wrote, “the fate of millions unborn hanging on the tongue of one man, heaven was silent in that awful moment!”

If any politician had enough prestige to possibly get the South to go along with a gradual abolition plan, it might’ve been George Washington. Washington had stated that he wanted “to see some plan adopted, by which slavery in this country may be abolished by slow, sure, and imperceptible degrees.” Henry Wiencek, in his book, “Imperfect God: George Washington, His Slaves, and the Creation of America”, notes that Washington was contemplating the freeing of his slaves during his Presidency as an example for the nation, but backed away from those plans. Washington’s wife and relatives did not share his distaste for slavery and were fiercely against any abolition plan. Wiencek felt this was a great missed opportunity for Washington and the nation.

Washington did eventually free his slaves in his will. George Washington wrote his will in secret in July 1799, to conceal his emancipation plans from the disapproval of his family. Henry Wiecker notes in his book that Washington owned only 123 of the 316 slaves in Mount Vernon. The rest were Martha’s slaves. He put in his will that the slaves that he owned would be freed upon the death of Martha Washington, as a way to appeal to Martha to follow his lead and emancipate her own slaves. The old and the infirm freed slaves would be taken care of until death by their heirs. The freed children would be bound by the Court until they reached 25 years of age, and they would be taught to read and write and be brought up to some useful occupation. To ensure that the executors of the will would not try to find some way to evade his wishes to free the slaves, Washington wrote:
“…and I do hereby expressly forbid the Sale, or transportation out of the said Commonwealth, of any Slave I may die possessed of, under any pretence whatsoever. And I do moreover most pointedly, and most solenmly enjoin it upon my Executors hereafter named, or the Survivors of them, to see that this clause respecting Slaves, and every part thereof be religiously fulfilled at the Epoch at which it is directed to take place; without evasion, neglect or delay…”

On February 3, 1790, Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Abolition Society had a petition in the House of Representatives to abolish slavery and stop the slave trade. The petition challenged the idea that the Constitution prohibited legislation against the slave trade until 1808 by suggesting that the “general welfare clause” (Article 1, Section 8 ) allowed the Congress to eliminate the slave trade and abolish slavery. It is written in the petition, “Your Memorialists, particularly engaged in attending to the Distresses arising from Slavery, believe it their indispensable Duty to present this Subject to your notice. They have observed with great Satisfaction that many important & salutary Powers are vested in you for ‘promoting the Welfare & Securing the blessings of liberty to the “People of the United States.’”

Many of the other Founding Fathers were against slavery. John Adams was an outspoken foe of the institution. Alexander Hamilton founded the New York Manumission Society, which was instrumental in abolishing slavery in that state. Some enlightened Virginians that were financially well off did free their own slaves, especially after the Virginia legislature passed a law permitting slave owners to free their own slaves at their own discretion. Robert Carter III, the richest man in Virginia, freed his 452 slaves and gave up his plantation. The book The First Emancipator: The Forgotten Story of Robert Carter, the Founding Father Who Freed His Slaves by Andrew Levy chronicles the influences of the radical Baptists in his views on race, where he worshipped side by side as equals with his slaves, in Carter’s enlightened views on race. In 1791, Carter filed a Deed of Gift in his home town of Williamsburg, Virginia, that led to a gradual manumitting of his 452 slaves. He did this inspite of his opposition of his sons and neighbors, which eventually led Carter to move to Baltimore to move away from their disapproval. In 1803 the year before his death, Carter wrote his daughter Harriot L. Maund, “My plans and advice have never been pleasing to the world”

The inability of the Founding Fathers to find a solution to the problem of slavery is one of their greatest failures. In spite of that, however, it is wrong for the Left and for many others to stereotype them as just being rich white men who were just interested in empire and business. Many of the Founding Fathers did care about abolishing slavery to square with the principals of liberty that was at the heart of the republican ideas of the Declaration of Independence. In this instance, radicals like Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison were need to provide the grassroots agitation to prod the nation to change. At heart, most of the Founding Fathers were liberal reformers who wanted to work within the system they created, and abolition needed radicals to provide the push from outside the system. Among the Founding Fathers, only Thomas Paine and perhaps a young Jefferson had that radical mindset. Abolition required a radical change in the South’s economic system away from the plantation system and the Founding Fathers were not willing to take that radical step.

October 17, 2009

African America Civil Rights Leaders and Gay Rights

Filed under: Uncategorized — angelolopez @ 11:09 pm

“Gays and lesbians stood up for civil rights in Montgomery, Selma, in Albany, Georgia, and St. Augustine, Florida, and many other campaigns of the Civil Rights Movement. Many of these courageous men and women were fighting for my freedom at a time when they could find few voices for their own, and I salute their contributions.”

Coretta Scott King, 25th anniversary luncheon for Lambda Defense and Education Fund, quoted in the Chicago Tribune, April 1, 1998

Recently a friend informed me that in the state of Maine, a proposition is on the ballot to try to outlaw gay marriages. Last year, I spent a lot of time researching arguments against Proposition 8 and found in the website by the gay evangelical group Soulforce several quotes from leaders of the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s and I will use them for this blog. All speak powerfully of the injustice of discrimination in any form, whether it be because of race, gender, ethnicity or sexual orientation. As the above quote by Coretta Scott King notes, many gays and lesbians participated in the great Civil Rights battles from the 1940s to the 1960s. Among them were Bayard Rustin, who organized the March on Washington in 1963, and James Baldwin, the famous writer.

Coretta Scott King was the wife of Martin Luther King Jr. and a strong advocate of civil rights in her own right. In 1964 Coretta lobbied hard for the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. King’s activism focused on womens’ rights, LGBT rights, economic issues, world peace and various other issues. In the 1980s King participated in a series of sit-in protests against apartheid in South Africa. An advocate of peace, King was one of the founders of The Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy. She was also vocal in her opposition of capital punishment and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Talking about her advocacy of LGBT rights, Coretta Scott King noted in a speech at the 13th annual Creating Change conference of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Atlanta, Georgia, November 9, 2000:

“We have a lot of work to do in our common struggle against bigotry and discrimination. I say ‘common struggle,’ because I believe very strongly that all forms of bigotry & discrimination are equally wrong and should be opposed by right-thinking Americans everywhere. Freedom from discrimination based on sexual orientation is surely a fundamental human right in any great democracy, as much as freedom from racial, religious, gender, or ethnic discrimination.”

John Lewis was a leader of the Civil Rights Movement who spoke at the 1963 March on Washington. He organized sit-in demonstrations at lunch counters in Nashville, Tenessee and he volunteered in the Freedom Rides, where he went on desegregated bus rides to protest the segregation of interstate travel in the South. From 1963 to 1966 Lewis was the Chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and through that group, organized the voter registration drives and community action programs during the Mississippi Freedom Summer. Lewis was elected to Congress in November 1986 and has served as U.S. Representative of Georgia’s Fifth Congressional District since that time.The October 25, 2003 Boston Globe quotes Lewis:

“From time to time, America comes to a crossroads. With confusion and controversy, it’s hard to spot that moment. We need cool heads, warm hearts, and America’s core principles to cleanse away the distractions.

We are now at such a crossroads over same-sex couples’ freedom to marry. It is time to say forthrightly that the government’s exclusion of our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters from civil marriage officially degrades them and their families. It denies them the basic human right to marry the person they love. It denies them numerous legal protections for their families.

This discrimination is wrong. We cannot keep turning our backs on gay and lesbian Americans. I have fought too hard and too long against discrimination based on race and color not to stand up against discrimination based on sexual orientation. I’ve heard the reasons for opposing civil marriage for same-sex couples. Cut through the distractions, and they stink of the same fear, hatred, and intolerance I have known in racism and in bigotry.

Some say let’s choose another route and give gay folks some legal rights but call it something other than marriage. We have been down that road before in this country. Separate is not equal. The rights to liberty and happiness belong to each of us and on the same terms, without regard to either skin color or sexual orientation.

Some say they are uncomfortable with the thought of gays and lesbians marrying. But our rights as Americans do not depend on the approval of others. Our rights depend on us being Americans.

Sometimes it takes courts to remind us of these basic principles. In 1948, when I was 8 years old, 30 states had bans on interracial marriage, courts had upheld the bans many times, and 90 percent of the public disapproved of those marriages, saying they were against the definition of marriage, against God’s law. But that year, the California Supreme Court became the first court in America to strike down such a ban. Thank goodness some court finally had the courage to say that equal means equal, and others rightly followed, including the US Supreme Court 19 years later.

Some stand on the ground of religion, either demonizing gay people or suggesting that civil marriage is beyond the Constitution. But religious rites and civil rights are two separate entities. What’s at stake here is legal marriage, not the freedom of every religion to decide on its own religious views and ceremonies.

I remember the words of John Kennedy when his presidential candidacy was challenged because of his faith: “I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant, nor Jewish — where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the pope, the National Council of Churches, or any other ecclesiastical source — where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials — and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.

Those words ring particularly true today. We hurt our fellow citizens and our community when we deny gay people civil marriage and its protections and responsibilities. Rather than divide and discriminate, let us come together and create one nation. We are all one people. We all live in the American house. We are all the American family. Let us recognize that the gay people living in our house share the same hopes, troubles, and dreams. It’s time we treated them as equals, as family.”

Rev. Bob Graetz was the only white minister to march with Martin Luther King Jr. during the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955 and 1956. Their participation in the boycott made them targets of much harassment, as their house was twice the target of firebombings. Reverand Graetz and his wife Jeannie served an all-black Lutheran congregation in Montgomery, Alabama in 1955. Today Rev. Graetz and his wife serve as instructors at The Soulforce Institute for Nonviolent Change. Rev. Graetz said:

“We are a retired Lutheran pastor and spouse, whose oldest son was born gay, and who at the age of 37 died with AIDS. Having spent years coming to grips with and trying to understand the concept of homosexuality, we have ultimately come to recognize this condition as a special gift of God conveyed to some of his carefully selected daughters and sons. We have come to know personally thousands of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered persons. And we have also become convinced that this condition is part of the ‘creative given’ rather than a personal choice by those individuals.”

“We have spent most of our lives struggling against the oppression of African-Americans and other groups within our society who are the objects of discrimination and prejudice. And we consider our ministry with and for the GLBT community to be an extension of that life-long commitment.”

Rev. Dr. James Lawson is a distinguished United Methodist pastor who worked side-by-side with Dr. King training the activists who participated in the lunch counter sit-ins and the Freedom Rides of the 1960s. He has continued to train activists in nonviolence and to work in support of a number of causes, including immigrants’ rights in the United States and the rights of Palestinians, opposition to the war in Iraq, and workers’ rights to a living wage. In 2004, he received the Community of Christ International Peace Award. Rev. Lawson said of the plight of many homosexuals:

“Gays and lesbians have a more difficult time than we did. We had our families and our churches on our side. All too often, they have neither.”

Julian Bond was a founding member of SNCC in 1960. While a student at Morehouse College in Atlanta, he helped organize a sit-in movement at Atlanta University. In 1965 Bond was elected to the Georgia House of Representatives, but the members of the House would not seat him because of his opposition to the Vietnam War. Bond was elected two more times before the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Georgia House had violated Bond’s rights in refusing him his seat. Since 1998, Julian Bond has served as Chairman of the Board of the NAACP and is on the board of directors of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Julian Bond said at the 2008 Creating Change Conference:

“That’s why when I am asked, ‘Are gay rights civil rights?’ my answer is always, ‘Of course they are.’”

“Rights for gays and lesbians are not ’special rights’ in any way. It isn’t “special” to be free from discrimination — that’s an ordinary, universal entitlement of citizenship.”

“No parallels between movements for rights is exact. African-Americans are the only Americans who were enslaved for more than two centuries, and people of color carry the badge of who we are on our faces. But we are far from the only people suffering discrimination — sadly, so do many others. They deserve the law’s protection and they deserve civil rights too. Sexual disposition parallels race — I was born black and I had no choice. I couldn’t and wouldn’t change if I could. Like race, our sexuality isn’t a preference — it is immutable, unchangeable, and the Constitution protects us against prejudices based on immutable differences.”

In 1963, Richard and Mildred Loving, an African American and white interracial couple, decided to challenge the miscegenation laws of Virginia and this eventually lead to a Supreme Court ruling that overturned the ban on interracial marriages in the United States. The Lovings married in Washington D.C. to avoid Virginia’s miscegenation laws, but when they returned to their home state, they were arrested in their bedroom for living together as an interracial couple. The judge suspended the case as long as the Lovings left Virginia for 25 years. They eventually took their case to the Supreme Court and in 1967, the Court unanimously decided that miscegenation laws was against the Fourteenth Amendments’ goals of equality.

Richard Loving died in 1975 when he was struck by a drunk driver. Mildred Loving survived and lived until May 2, 2008, when she died on pneumonia. On June 12, 2007, the 40th anniversary of the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court decision, Mildred Loving issued a statement which said:

“My generation was bitterly divided over something that should have been so clear and right. The majority believed that what the judge said, that it was God’s plan to keep people apart, and that government should discriminate against people in love. But I have lived long enough now to see big changes. The older generation’s fears and prejudices have given way, and today’s young people realize that if someone loves someone, they have a right to marry.

Surrounded as I am now by wonderful children and grandchildren, not a day goes by that I don’t think of Richard and our love, our right to marry, and how much it meant to me to have that freedom to marry the person precious to me, even if others thought he was the ‘wrong kind of person’ for me to marry. I believe all Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry. Government has no business imposing some people’s religious beliefs over others. Especially if it denies people’s civil rights.

I am still not a political person, but I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.”

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.