Angelolopez’s Weblog

May 16, 2012

Democrats and Republicans For Gay Rights

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , — angelolopez @ 6:03 am

The big news of the past week has been President Obama’s comments in an interview that he now supports same-sex marriage. Over the years, he has stated his opposition to gay marriage, but added that his views were “evolving”. This has been an issue where many Democratic and Republican politicians have seen their views evolve to the point where they now support gay marriage. This issue cuts across ideological lines where now several conservative Republicans are joining their liberal Democrat colleagues in support of marriage equality. In an article by Helene Cooper and Jeremy Peters for the May 15, 2012 New York Times, they write:

“If you don’t know anyone who’s gay, then it’s an alien lifestyle,” said Theodore Olson, the former solicitor general for President George W. Bush who supports same-sex marriage. But, he added, when “you realize that that’s Mary from down the street, she’s a lesbian and she’s with Sally, what would it be like if they couldn’t be together?” people come around.

During the civil rights movement, many white Northerners — including some who had never before interacted with black people — joined African-Americans to fight for the principle of equal rights, often opposing white Southerners who had lived among blacks all their lives yet saw nothing wrong with the separate but equal statutes. Principle seemed to come before the personal in many cases.

With the gay rights movement, it often seems that the opposite applies. While there are many people who support gay rights because it is in line with their personal or political views, for many others, their approach on the issue is experiential, and comes down to a simple issue: knowing an openly gay couple. In fact, it can seem as if there are two Americas when it comes to gay rights: one in which same-sex couples interact regularly with their straight counterparts, helping to soften impressions of homosexuality, and another in which being gay or lesbian remains largely unspoken.

Here are some youtube videos of Democrats and Republicans supporting gay marriage and gay rights

A youtube video of President Barack Obama supporting gay marriage

A youtube video of Republican former Vice President Dick Cheney supporting gay marriage

A youtube video of Republican state representative Maureen Walsh endorsing gay marriage

A youtube video of Republican Theodore Olson, the former solicitor general for President George W. Bush, describing his support of gay marriage

A youtube video of Democrat Bill Clinton endorsing gay marriage

A youtube video of Congresswomen Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Democrat) and Ileanna Ros-Lehtinen (Republican) giving their thanks for receiving the 2010 Equality Florida Voice for Equality award

A youtube video of Republican San Diego mayor Jerry Saunders discussing his personal journey to becoming a supporter of gay marriage

A youtube video of NYS Senator Ruth Hassell-Thompson speaking on the Marriage Equality Bill on the floor of the NYS Senate Chamber. Dec. 2, 2009

A youtube video of Democratic Vice President Joe Biden support of gay marriage

Evangelicals for Gay Rights

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — angelolopez @ 6:01 am

Last March the Christian gay rights group Soulforce has sponsored the Equality Rides to challenge LGBT discrimination in many of the Christian colleges across the nation. This is part of a growing group of Evangelical Christians who are challenging the homophobia within the Evangelical church and are fighting for the fair treatment of LGBT people in the Evangelical church. A younger generation of Evangelicals are challenging longstanding assumptions among older evangelicals on social justice issues, gay rights issues, environmental issues and immigration issues.

An article in the May 5, 2012 edition of the Economist entitled “Lift Every Voice, the growth of non-white evangelicals and the changing attitudes of a younger generation of Evangelicals are leading to growing challenge to the conservative Republican politics of the majority of Evangelicals today. The article states:

To Latino evangelicals, says Mr Salguero, caring for the poor and “the stranger among us” are moral and religious issues, and collectively they trump similar issues, such as abortion and gay marriage, on which they might find common ground with white evangelicals. “We’re a pro-life community,” Mr Salguero says, “but when we talk about being pro-life, we’re also talking about quality of life, which includes quality of health care, standing against the death penalty, against torture and against pre-emptive war.”

In a similar vein, Mrs Sullivan says that the evangelical right’s focus on abortion and gay marriage “overshadows broader social justice issues”. She insists that among evangelicals of her generation such views are not unusual, and the data back her up. In a 2008 poll, a plurality (44%) of young evangelicals characterised their “political views on social issues (health care, poverty)” as “liberal”. Younger evangelicals are more likely than older ones to favour environmental protection and same-sex marriage. And although they remain overwhelmingly pro-life, nearly one-third of them voted for Mr Obama, suggesting greater willingness to vote for a candidate who believes that abortion must remain a matter of choice.

Then there are the more numinous trends. In 1968 Martin Luther King called Sunday morning “the most segregated hour of Christian America”; today there are a growing number of multicultural evangelical churches, largely driven by young Christians. Soong Chan-Rah, a Korean-American pastor and professor of evangelism at Chicago’s North Park seminary, says the rise in multicultural evangelical churches coincides with a decline in the numbers of traditional white evangelicals, and that the newer kind practise a form of evangelical Christianity distinct from the “white, middle-class and Southern” version. These churches, he says, “don’t have that sense of triumphalism, that sense that America has to be a great Christian nation.”

This change can be seen in the growing number of Evangelical Christians who are supporting gay rights. Several Evangelical groups, like Soulforce, Faith In America and the Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists are dedicated to fighting religious based bigotry. On February 25, The Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists (AWAB), The Baptist Peace Fellowship of North America and The Alliance of Baptists began its “Many Voices, One Love” campaign by hosting three LGBT marriage equality conferences throughout the country. Last year the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship (CBF) began a serious conversation on homosexuality within the Baptist church. Faith In America has recently called upon Bryant Wright, president of the Southern Baptist Convention, to apologize for incendiary speech that compared affirmation of gay and lesbian people to Nazi propaganda during World War II.

Along with Christian groups, individual Evangelical Christians are showing their support of gay rights.

Kathy Potts, an Evangelical Christian conservative who recently served as the Republican committee chair for the Rick Perry for President campaign, wrote an editorial supporting marriage equality in the Cedar Rapids Gazette. She wrote:

I support marriage for gay and lesbian couples and have been vocal about my support, even when it hasn’t always been the popular thing to do in my party.

I heard a lot of rhetoric about gay and lesbian Americans that didn’t fit with what I know to be true and what many Republicans believe. As an evangelical Christian Republican, I know many people who hold conservative values like equality and freedom, but those voices were lost this year. However, I believe in my heart that things are changing. If it weren’t for the loud voices of a few in our party, I do believe more Republicans would stand up in support of marriage equality.

I didn’t always feel that way and my journey toward full support has been a long and intensive one. One of the things that changed my mind on this issue was my children. I used to watch my kids and wonder why equality is a non-issue with them. They love and support their friends, regardless of their sexual orientation, race, gender or religion.

Then I realized that I was tired of watching adults judge each other while my children could embrace the differences in their friends. After all, that is what being a Christian is all about.

Evangelical Christian Kathy Baldock wrote a blog about her own journey to supporting gay rights:

I know that as recently as 2004, when asked, I did not believe I would see any gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender people in heaven.

Relationship, along with my own questioning and doubts on other personal issues caused me to wonder if what I had been told about the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (glbt) communities was accurate. I was in an open space that doubt often causes and it was here that I was more receptive to the calling by God to be sensitive to the heart and voices of His glbt children.

After six years of ministering in this very messy spot in and out of the churches, I am now an advocate to the glbt for equality and inclusion in Christian churches. I write, speak, educate, listen and dialogue. Oh,there is lots of dialogue! I am open to engaging church leaders and staff in conversation about the treatment and inclusion of glbt people into the Kingdom and Family of God with equality.

So, why is this ministry called “CanyonWalker Connections”? I hike a lot in some canyons near my home in the Northern Sierra. I’ve done this daily for a few decades. It is on these canyon dirt and snowy trails that I talk to and listen to God and the Holy Spirit. Trails have become my sacred place. In the spiritual realm, I also seems to walk, but, in the not-so-lovely space between two groups: the church and the glbt Christian communities. I bring the message of a non-discriminating, Biblical Jesus, the Grace Giver Supreme in that place of dialogue and tension that many of us have ignored or feel uncomfortable in.

Evangelical Christian Brent Childers explains his support of gay rights in the October 7, 2009 edition of Newsweek

So what it is that would bring someone from a place where he once declared himself a “Jesse Helms Republican,” a man who condemned homosexuality as a threat to children and society, told his own son that being gay is a ticket to hell, to travel from Hickory, N.C., to the West Lawn of the Capitol building on Oct. 11, 2009? How can one travel from the seemingly impossible road of bigotry to one of acceptance and love for our LGBT brothers and sisters? The answer is one that I hope religious leaders such as Pat Robertson and James Dobson (and most importantly, their followers) will hear.

It’s because something deep inside told me that I needed to step out in faith onto a bridge of knowledge and understanding. I didn’t know where this bridge would take me but something was telling me it was a path I needed to walk. My own mother challenged me in 2003 to look at my beliefs and the true intent behind the teachings I held in blind faith. “Do you think your views are Christ-like?” she asked me. Her question was dead on: once I walked away from the Church’s teachings of rejection and condemnation, my relationship with God transcended to a higher spiritual plateau. I realized an unparalleled sense of spiritual clarity when I opened my heart and mind to a genuine expression of love, compassion, and acceptance of all sexual orientations and gender identities.

This new voice—Christ’s voice—became the core principles of my faith: love, compassion, and respect. That voice I now realize was desperately wanting to be heard, a voice no longer comfortable with the place in which I had chose to confine it for so long—a place of bigotry, prejudice, fear, and misunderstanding.

The walk across that bridge wasn’t very strenuous but it was at times painful. The pain came as I began to realize for the first time that I had been using my faith to bring harm to others. That’s not a pleasant realization for anyone who marches under a Christian banner of love, respect, and compassion.

David P. Gushee, professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University, wrote an article for the June 2, 2009 issue of Christian Century in which he wrote:

Christ’s command that we love our neighbors, especially the most despised and rejected, means that we must respond immediately to the crisis outlined in this book. Such love requires not only that we be vigilant about the impact of individual and congregational words and actions, but also that we consider seriously the broader ramifications of Christian activism that seeks to oppose all social advances for gay and lesbian people. Many Christians act as if opposing gays and lesbians is fundamental to the church’s mission, which leads many gay and lesbian people to perceive Christianity as their mortal enemy. Is this how we want to be perceived?

…We who are Christians must love our homosexual neighbors. We must treat them as we would want to be treated. We must remember that as we do to them, we do to Jesus (Matt. 25:31ff.). We must oppose their harassment and bullying in schools, churches and clubs—everywhere. We must rebuke any Christian who speaks or acts hatefully toward gays and lesbians. We must teach Christian parents of gay children to communicate unconditional love and under no circumstances evict them from either their hearts or their homes, no matter what they believe about the moral significance of homosexual inclinations. We must seek opportunities in the church to build relationships with those who so often have encountered Christian hatred.

Jared Byas wrote a blog entitled “Evangelicals for Gay Marriage” where he wrote:

But instead, evangelicals seem to be very good at making sure people who are not Christians know that they are “breaking the rules” of Christianity. And as such, we have gained the reputation for being judgmental, a moniker well-deserved for the most part. It is God’s place to judge the world, it is our place to love it. And just like the story we find in Adam & Eve, when we put ourselves in God’s place, we make a mess of things.

Secondly, then, what is the best way to love the world? And remember, love is not an emotion, but, as DC Talk profoundly says, “love is a verb.” One way I know is to show people the love of Jesus by supporting them in their fight for equality, to stand with them. It doesn’t matter if I agree with their lifestyle or not (it’s not my place to judge, remember). My main goal as an evangelical Christian is to reflect the resurrected Christ and his Kingdom. And I believe Jesus is on the side of those without power and his kingdom is one of equality, where no one is a second-class citizen, whether that be conservative Christian, drug addict, homosexual, atheist, or politician. We all bear God’s image in this story.

Thirdly, I don’t want to be on the wrong side of history again. I am not sure Christians realize that they were, for the most part, on the wrong side of the slave issue. The Bible was used weekly during the Civil War to support slavery as morally acceptable. Not only that, but by taking care of the “less than human blacks,” the white slave owners were being quite compassionate, taking care of a race that couldn’t survive in the civilized world on their own. It was so “obvious” that the Bible supported slavery. . .

And, lest we forget, it was a Christian culture that kept women from being able to vote until only 100 years ago. I am ashamed that a “Christian” culture didn’t support or even acknowledge the equality of women until . . . well, in some Christian circles, they still don’t.

So, the way I see the text of the prophets, the life of Jesus, and the trajectory of the New Testament, I would much rather be held accountable to God for fighting for the equality and dignity of all humans (sorry God, I assumed I should fight for the rights of those who didn’t have them) than to be held accountable to God for excluding rights from people for the sake of religious rules (sorry God, I thought I was supposed to tell the world how sinful they are and that my government should privilege Christian culture at the expense of other people).

A youtube video of Reverand John Reitan and his wife Dorothy Reitan supporting a Washington law recognizing civil marriage of people of the same sex

A youtube video of Evangelical Kathy Baldock talking about her journey to supporting gay rights

A youtube video of Dr. David Gushsee talking about seeking common ground on matters ranging from abortion to gay and lesbian issues to religion in the public square


A youtube video of a March 25th meeting of EQUAL (Empowering Queer Activists and Leaders) welcoming the 2012 Soulforce Equality Ride to Kansas City

A youtube video of The Evangelical Network, a network of gay affirming Evangelical Churches, Ministries and Christian Workers, speaking out about gay marriage and the churches response

A youtube video of a Chuck Colson, Greg Boyd, and Shane Claiborne discussion of evangelical attitudes towards homosexuality

A youtube video of a spoken word at the Life Rally in Love Park, Philadelphia

May 5, 2012

An Interview With Cartoonist Steve Greenberg

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — angelolopez @ 12:53 am


Two years ago I attended a convention of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists in Portland and met many great editorial cartoonists from around the country. The very first cartoonist that I met was Steve Greenberg and his wife Roberta. Steve Greenberg is one of the most insightful political cartoonists in this country. Steve has several cartoons published in Southern Californian publications, among them the Ventura County Reporter, the influential L.A. news and politics site LA Observed.com and the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles. His cartoons are distributed in PoliticalCartoons.com. He also contributes to the Cartoon Movement out of The Netherlands, the first American cartoonist invited to join. He is also an award-winning informational graphics artist and illustrator.

Your cartoons do a good job of distilling an issue in a single powerful image. What cartoonists or illustrators influenced your style?

Among my strongest influences were Paul Conrad of the Los Angeles Times (this was the paper we read each morning), who was the master of the powerful, searing-image cartoon, Ron Cobb, cartoonist for the underground L.A. Free Press (I never saw that paper at the time, but saw his work via book collections and a gallery exhibit), whose brilliant work blew me away, and Tony Auth of the Philadelphia Inquirer, who taught me how to communicate well with simpler images. There were many others, including 20th century masters Bill Mauldin (whose work I saw in library collections), Britain’s David Low (whose work was in my history textbooks) and the brilliant Don Wright. Plus like many Baby-Boomers, I was quite influenced by Mad magazine.

Your cartoons are very critical of the Republican Party. What are your thoughts on how the Republican primaries have gone? Are you looking forward to the 2012 elections?

As a cartoonist, I look forward to the vast amounts of material these people are likely to provide me… but as a citizen, I’m appalled by their backwards, regressive, anti-science, anti-consumer, anti-Middle Class, anti-equality, anti-disadvantaged, anti-environment, anti-reform and pro-greed positions.

You have some of the most insightful cartoons of Israel and their ongoing conflict with the Palestinians. I especially like your May 24, 2011 cartoon on Israel’s tough dilemma. What’s your take on obstacles for peace between the Israelis and Palestinians? What periodicals or writers do you read to learn about issues in Israel?


I cartoon weekly for the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, a gig that sort of just fell into my lap. I read the various opinions there, plus get a constant stream of emails on matters relating to Israel and the Mideast. Many of these are unfailingly pro-Israel, but some are more nuanced and recognize the issues are not one-sided and black and white.

The main obstacles to peace include each side being beholden to domestic interests that would oust them (or worse) if they were seen as too compromising, plus many of the Palestinians seem to have developed a victim mentality that they feel entitles them to not want to compromise (or negotiate) at all.

When I attended the AAEC political cartoonist convention 2 years ago, most cartoonists were telling me that most American political cartoonist are still influential on local issues, but they don’t really have much sway on national issues anymore. Yet when one looks outside the U.S., political cartoonists in other countries still have a strong influence on the politics of their country. Recently, Syrian cartoonist Ali Ferzat had his hands broken by government thugs after Ferzat made a cartoon critical of Syrian President Assad. In 2010, Sri Lankan cartoonist Prageeth Eknaligoda disappeared the day before the Presidential elections in Sri Lanka, just after he did cartoons publicizing the exploitation of the Sri Lankan people. Iranian cartoonist Nikahang Kowsar was arrested in 2001 for doing a cartoon criticizing an Iranian cleric. Are there any American political cartoonists today who still have the same sort of influence on national issues that foreign cartoonists have in their country? If not, what do you think has caused a decline in influence in American political cartoonists?

The nations you mention are all repressive places that lack the same sort of free press that we have, so that strong dissenting voices like cartoonists are seen as threats to the regime that need to be silenced. I don’t see any American political cartoonists who have the same sort of influence, and am not sure anyone ever did; perhaps Thomas Nast had the most such impact, in an era of much less literacy. That said, the decline in the (small) influence by American political cartoonists is attributable to the wipeout of so many cartoonists’ jobs, the syndicated homogenization of voices in print and the societal change from a small number of mass media voices (one or two daily newspapers per city, three TV networks, a few major magazines) to a highly diffused constellation of thousands of websites and blogs with no one place for a cartoonist to really command the way that, say, Conrad commanded the massively influential L.A. Times of the 1960s and 1970s.

I recently became a cartoonist for a Filipino American newspaper. I’m ashamed to admit though, that I initially didn’t know too much about issues in the Filipino American community and have had to do a lot of reading to get up to date on Filipino American issues. You do a lot of cartoons for Jewish publications in Southern California. You seem to have a strong progressive Jewish political point of view. How has been the reception of your cartoons in the Jewish community in your area? Are there any people who’ve had a particular influence on your political point of view?

I’m a controversial figure within the local Jewish community. The moderate liberals love what I do, but much of the mainstream sees me as too liberal and not sufficiently sympathetic to all that Israel has to go through (while some on the far left see me as too pro-Israel!).

Your cartoons are strongly critical of our financial system and of the growing economic inequalities in our country. These are themes that the recent Occupy Wall Street have tried to highlight. Though your cartoons are sympathetic to the Occupy Wall Street message, a cartoon you did on November 28, 2011 was skeptical of the likelihood of the Occupy protests in overcoming a powerful system and the influence of money. What do you see are the strengths and weaknesses of the Occupy Wall Street movement? What have the local Occupy protest groups been like in your area?

Occupy L.A. was pretty much like it was in the rest of the nation. It’s a movement that has no organization, structure or center, just people with some common goals (or complaints)… that’s not really a match for powerful, lawyer-laden corporate interests and entrenched political interests, and it hasn’t reached enough of a critical mass at this point to have had the impact it hoped for. Money talks louder than ever these days. I was sad to have drawn that cartoon about the futility of “Occupy,” but felt it reflected the reality of the situation. That being said, I remember when Howard Jarvis and his tax-reform plans were just a whacko fringe movement… until his Proposition 13 won in 1978.

In the early part of the 20th century, radical political cartoonists like Art Young, Boardman Robinson, and Robert Minor took part demonstrations, rallies and other sorts of political activities in addition to doing political cartoons. Do you participate in protests or political rallies?

No. I’m uncomfortable with that, and am not sure if nominally-objective journalists (which includes editorial cartoonists) should be involved with activism. I’ve spoken on a few occasions, when invited, to Democratic groups, but that’s about it. I can’t tell other cartoonists what to do, though… I’m personally just introverted and find my comfort level inside at my own drawing board.

How do you create your cartoons?

I sit down with a sheet of blank paper and see what I sketch out. I usually have a topic or two I want to explore, but don’t always know what I want to say about it or even what my overall viewpoint is on the topic — I have a sort of dialogue with myself, with my sketches being the feedback. Sometimes I’ll have the viewpoint but not the specific idea, sometimes I’ll sketch a good concept and it will firm up or even create my viewpoint. On occasion, I’ll sketch a good idea that I can’t support politically and throw it out. Sometimes I do know exactly what I want to say and how… those are the easier and often better cartoons.

Once I have my idea, I draw it out reasonably quickly in pencil, then go over it with a ballpoint pen to nail down the image. I take this to my light box and draw carefully on better paper (usually a heavy laser paper) with a Uniball Vision pen, then go over those lines with heavier pens like Micron Pigma ones or a Faber-Castell brush marker. I scan the finished linework and go to work in Photoshop, cleaning up the image and adjusting the pieces if necessary, then adding the shading or coloring. I used to hand-letter everything, but I’ve gotten lazier and my time is limited, so I more often letter with cartoon fonts or with regular fonts for specific uses.

When I went to the AAEC convention two years ago, I enjoyed meeting other political cartoonists from California. Have you kept in contact with other political cartoonists in Southern California?

It’s all very occasional. I sometimes am in contact with David G. Brown, Daryl Cagle, Lalo Alcarez, former SoCal editorial cartoonist Monte Wolverton (who’s now in Southwestern Washington) and a few others, but it’s all pretty infrequent. If I go to the AAEC convention it’s generally the only time I’ll see my colleagues in a given year.

When we met 2 years ago, you were kidding me because I was wearing a Boston Celtics shirt. So how are the Lakers doing this year? Do you think they can go deep this year in the playoffs?

The Lakers are so-so this year, as I write this, and the Clippers are finally the more interesting team in town (and doing better at the time of this writing)… but I’m not much of a basketball fan.

Here are more interviews that I did for Everyday Citizen

An Interview With Eric Wilks
An Interview With Cartoonist Greg Beda
An Interview With Poet Melissa Tuckey
An Interview With Cartoonist Andy Singer
An Interview With Author Robert Balmanno
An Interview With Cartoonist J.P. Jasper
An Interview With Cartoonist David Cohen

An Interview With Cartoonist Jesse Springer

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — angelolopez @ 12:52 am

When I attended my first convention of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists, I met a great cartoonist from Oregon named Jesse Springer. Jesse has been doing political cartoons since 1994, and his work has been incisively commenting on the political and social scene in the Oregon area. In 2007 and 2009, he won the Grand Prize in the Science Idol cartoon contest, sponsored by the Union of Concerned Scientists. To see some of his cartoons, you can click on this link

You’ve been a regular cartoonist since 1994. What got you started in political cartooning? Who were your artistic inspirations?

Probably like most cartoonists, I have always liked to draw as far back as I can remember. Notebooks and school papers were filled with doodles and gags for the amusement of myself and friends. And I was always aware of political events growing up, but for some reason, I never brought the two together. It wasn’t until I graduated from college (1990) and began to live life as “an adult” that these political events suddenly seemed to have some relevance to my life. In particular, it was the local political happenings that seemed the most immediate– had the most direct impact on my life. Eugene has a very good, independently-owned daily newspaper, and I began to really become a student of the editorial cartoons. Among the syndicated cartoonists that appeared in the Eugene paper, I would say that Borgman and Toles were the ones I was most drawn to. Before too long, cartoon ideas that applied to local and statewide issues began popping into my head. One day, I decided to sketch a couple of those out. In addition to the daily paper, Eugene has a number of alternative papers, which eventually ran one of those first cartoons (1994). I didn’t get paid, of course, but the idea that I could express myself politically through a cartoon, and that it might be read by some unknown number of fellow citizens, was very exciting.

I don’t know too much about the Oregon political scene, but I assume that it’s a Blue state since it’s near the coast. What is the political scene like in Oregon? From the cartoons that I’ve seen of yours, you seem like a political moderate. What has been the feedback of your cartoons in the local community?

Oregon does tip to the blue side, but it is not a dyed-in-the-wool liberal state. The political scene is very bi-polar, with the urban/rural split accounting for that divide. The urban centers in the Western side of the state account for all of the progressive liberal population, with rural areas tending to be more conservative. And it doesn’t take long to drive out of town to get to that rural place! There is also a fierce independent streak– kind of a modern day Wild West mentality that runs up and down the state. So, the debate is usually very spirited. We also have some of our very own issues, such as being the first state to legalize Assisted Suicide.

It’s probably not a good trait for a political cartoonist, but I am the kind of person that sees both sides to an issue. That’s probably why I come off as a moderate. Some of my cartoons reflect the absurd aspect to an issue, rather than take a specific political point of view. I probably draw a higher percentage of those cartoons than other cartoonists. That’s partly because of my even-handedness, but it’s also because I want to try and maintain and establish a client base that isn’t just in the liberal enclaves. As far as feedback goes, I get the occasional e-mail or letter of complaint or praise– nothing too extreme. My phone number is still listed in the phone book.

Your October 20, 2011 cartoon on the Tea Party and Occupy Oregon seems to see some common ground in the discontent found in both grassroots movements. What is your thoughts on both social movements? How has Occupy Oregon been in your area?

There were pretty strong Occupy Portland and Occupy Eugene movements in the fall, but, like all of the others, they were eventually dismantled– at least their physical occupations were. As a person who has little faith in the current political system, it was exciting to see such a popular movement, but dis-heartening to see so little interest in a concrete agenda that might remedy some of this country’s political ills. I have been hearing more about constitutional amendments to limit campaign contributions and eliminate corporate personhood, which I think are root causes to many of our problems, so I am encouraged by that. If the Tea Partiers are truly for real, then those are two issues that they should also be able to get behind. I think that if there are one or two specific issues like that that Occupiers and Tea Partiers can get behind without worrying about their other differences, then that would really be powerful and exciting.

You do a lot of cartoons on the local scene. What are your thoughts on doing cartoons on local issues as opposed to doing cartoons on national issues? Do you feel your local issue cartoons have an influence on readers?

It was interesting for me to go to two recent AAEC Conventions and hear everyone talk about how they were doing more and more local cartoons, either at the request of their editors, or simply as a response to the changing needs of their regional papers. That’s how I started out, and I never really got going commenting on the national level, so that isn’t really a big change for me. On one hand, it sometimes feels limiting to narrow my focus to Oregon issues, when there are so many other important issues of national import going on. On the other hand, there is something to the notion that the more local the issue, the more directly it affects you. The more something affects you, the greater the feeling it can cause which in turn inspires my cartoons, so I ultimately like the local focus. As far as whether my cartoons influence readers– I think that is the $64,000 question cartoonists would love to be able to answer (hopefully, in the affirmative).

You’ve done a quite a few cartoons on Oregon universities and on public education. Here in California, students are protesting proposed budget cuts. How is Oregon’s education system doing nowadays?

This is one of the interesting things about doing local/state-level cartoons. So many of them could be applicable to other states. Of course Oregon’s schools are going down the toilet just like everywhere else. And it’s not just that the per-student level of funding has gone, it’s that the costs of health care for teachers has gone sky-high. Like many other issues, I think there are root-cause problems that need to be solved first. In the case of education, if we can get this “public option” healthcare plan (that just passed the Oregon legislature) to work, then I think it will really be a boon to education as much as anything else.

Whenever I’ve talked to political cartoonists, they seem to share the worry about the future of newspapers and magazines as outlets for their work. What do you see is the future of political cartoons? As a freelancer, how does this affect you?

I worry about newspapers more because of what it means for us as an educated society more than for my own sake. Who is going to actually do the reporting if we gut all of the newsrooms and fire all of the reporters? Fortunately, for me personally, I don’t have very far to fall because I haven’t risen very high in the cartooning world. Cartooning brings in less than 10% of my total income (my graphic design business accounts for the other 90%). Of course I would be sad if I didn’t have that traditional outlet for my cartoons, but I would be a lot sadder for other reasons.

Your political cartoons are very thoughtful and insightful. They’re more gentle commentary rather than a biting and harsh attack on society. What is your philosophy on social commentary?

As I’ve said, I tend to see both (or all) sides of an issue, so I am not prone to all-out nuclear attacks with my cartoons. I know some cartoonists would probably think less of me because of it, but that’s just who I am. It’s not that I don’t have a political opinion, nor am I afraid to express it in a cartoon, but I guess– going back to your other question about persuading readers– I think a lighter touch is more effective than a bludgeoning over the head. For a lot of the issues I tackle, I try to think about it from a kid’s perspective. As adults we get wrapped up in all kinds of convoluted arguments and justifications for our political viewpoints– just take a step back and look at it from a child’s mind, a beginner’s mind. Usually, when I do that, the absurdity (or absurdities) become abundantly clear.

What is your process in coming up with ideas and creating your cartoon?

First I read the news in the paper and online. Then, I choose a topic to tackle (this is often the hardest part: an issue I am passionate about may not have gotten much media coverage, or vice versa). I write a concise statement about the opinion I aim to express with my cartoon (this is important too: sometimes when I am having trouble coming up with an idea, it’s because I am fuzzy on exactly what I am trying to say). Then, I just get that blank sheet of paper and start noodling around with ideas. I tend to be just as verbal as I am visual, so there is often a play on words as part of my cartoons. Once I get an idea that I like, I draw a thumbnail sketch and scan it on the computer so I can print it out larger, at the size I want to draw it. Sometimes, instead of an integrated thumbnail sketch, I’ll draw rough sketches of the constituent pieces just anywhere on the paper– it’s a little less constraining that way. Then I assemble the pieces in Photoshop into an integrated whole. Then I print out that rough drawing at about 10″ x 7″ size and put it on the light table. Then, using a Pentel brush pen and whatever regular pens I have handy, I’ll do the final inking on a fresh sheet of paper. Then, I scan that, touch up any little blips, and then add color using a Wacom Tablet. Presto– a cartoon in about 4-5 hours.

In 2007, you won the Grand prize in the 2007 Science Idol cartoon contest. Describe that experience. What was that contest for?

The main goal of the Union of Concerned Scientists is to promote the use of unbiased science in policy making. The biggest threat to that is interference in science by people with pre-defined political agendas. The Science Idol Contest– inspired by “American Idol”– was thought up as a way to try and add some levity to an otherwise serious subject, and also to try and get a little more exposure outside of purely scientific circles. Little known in cartooning circles at first, the first Grand Prize was won by a teacher from Ohio in 2006. When I heard about it the next year, the Grand Prize was $500 plus a trip to Washington D.C. to have lunch with Tom Toles. This was before I had joined the AAEC, so I had never met a “real” cartoonist before, and Toles was one of my absolute heroes. I had to win. I can’t remember all of the specifics, but I entered about five cartoons, three of which were sleeted among the top 12 finalists. Those 12 finalists were chosen from a prescreened group of about 64 by a panel of judges, one of whom was Garry Trudeau, another one of my cartoon Gods. As a part of the process, I traded e-mails with him which I consider to be quite an honor. Anyhow, the Grand prize was determined by online voting, so I motivated my friends, family– I even got on the local news and encouraged people to vote for my cartoon. The problem was, People had to vote for a specific cartoon, not a specific person, so the fact that I had three cartoons among the 12 finalists had the potential to split the vote. In the end, the cartoon that I encouraged every one to vote for came in second… to my winning cartoon. The trip to Washington and the meeting with Toles would take too long to describe– suffice it to say, it was an experience of a lifetime for me.

In 2010, you did quite a few cartoons on the Ducks winning a championship. Is Oregon a big college sports scene? I’m not a college football fan, so how did they do in 2011?

Eugene, Oregon is home to the University of Oregon. Once a perennial doormat in the PAC-10 Athletic Conference (now the PAC-12), they are now amongst elite, thanks in large part to massive donations of cash by Nike co-founder Phil Knight. Given the fact that Oregon is home to only one major professional sports team (the Portland Trailblazers), the rise of the the athletic program at the University of Oregon has indeed become a big deal for the state. After the 2010 season, the Ducks football team played in the National Chamionship game against Auburn, and lost by 3 points. Prior to the game, I knew I wanted to have a cartoon ready for either outcome. That’s why when you look on my web site under January 2011, you’ll see one cartoon that shows the Ducks winning and one that shows the Ducks losing. Unfortunately, it was the latter that ran. Skip ahead to the 2011 season, although they did not play in the National Championship game, the Ducks did notch their first Rose Bowl victory since 1916, against the Wisconsin Badgers.
Here are more interviews that I did for Everyday Citizen

An Interview With Cartoonist Steve Greenberg
An Interview With Eric Wilks
An Interview With Cartoonist Greg Beda
An Interview With Poet Melissa Tuckey
An Interview With Cartoonist Andy Singer
An Interview With Author Robert Balmanno
An Interview With Cartoonist J.P. Jasper
An Interview With Cartoonist David Cohen

An Interview With Cartoonist Adam Zyglis

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , — angelolopez @ 12:50 am

Adam Zyglis is one of the best young political cartoonists today. I met him briefly about two years ago in an Association of American Editorial Cartoonist Convention in Portland, Oregon, and have been a fan of his work since seeing his incisive cartoons in the Buffalo News. Adam’s cartoons are internationally syndicated and appear in publications like The Washington Post, USA Today, The New York Times and Los Angeles Times. He also does illustration work for magazines such as The Week, Time, and MAD Magazine. In 2004, he graduated from the Canisius College Honors program summa cum laude, with a major in Computer Science, a minor in Math and a concentration in Studio Arts. Adam’s first cartooning job was for The Griffin, the weekly student newspaper at the college, where he a first place national award from the Associated Collegiate Press and the Universal Press Syndicate. He placed second in the 2004 John Locher Memorial Award, and he was a finalist in the 2003 CharlesM. Schulz Award. In 2006 and 2011, Adam won third place for Editorial Cartoons in the National Headliner Awards, sponsored by the Atlantic City Press Club.

Thank you, Adam, for doing this interview. From reading your biography, you seem to have a wide variety of talents. You majored in Computer Science, which is a more logical and analytical process, and had a concentration in Studio Arts, which requires more creativity. What is it about each field that you enjoy? What kind of art did you for your Studio Arts studies?

I was originally drawn to Computer Science and Math because I wanted to develop graphics software. It was my way of trying to combine my art and critical thinking skills. However I ultimately found that editorial cartooning was a much better way to do that. I see both as forms of creative problem solving. In terms of my Studio Art work, I mainly focused on fundamentals like drawing, design and sculpture.

How did you get into political cartooning? Did you have any political cartoonists or artists that had a strong influence on you?

I started cartooning for my school paper at Canisius College. At first I targeted issues around campus, and then eventually focused on national politics. Writing my Honors thesis on cartooning and winning a few college contests gave me the push to try and pursue a career. I had some great guidance early on from veteran guys like Steve Sack and Clay Bennett. And being from Buffalo I grew up admiring the creativity of Tom Toles. In terms of art, I was more influenced by line artists like David Levine and Jack Davis.

You are the cartoonist of the Buffalo News, a paper with a circulation of 300,000. What’s it like to work for the paper? Do you get to go to an office?

I love working in the newsroom. For the first 6 years I was drawing from the art department in the middle of the action. That was nice for when big stories broke (like the Spitzer prostitution scandal). You could hear everyone’s reaction instantly. I recently moved into Toles’s old office in the corner of the editorial department, which is quieter and more conducive to thinking. An odd quirk to the space is that nobody can find a light switch so my light is never off. I prefer to think of that as a positive metaphor rather than a waste of energy…

I read in books of Paul Conrad and Herbert Block that they would frequently go to the reporters in the newspaper staff to learn more about particular issues and to see if there are things in their cartoons that are accurate. Do you ask around the Buffalo News reporters for information about issues that you want to do in your cartoons?

I do talk to a handful of people at work about issues and show them a stack of my rough cartoons. They are reporters, editorial writers and some in the art department. It’s important to get different perspectives on issues and see if my ideas communicate.

I don’t know the Buffalo political scene very well. But in looking at some of your latest cartoons, it seems like education is an important issue right now. What is the political scene like in Buffalo right now? Is it a more liberal or a more conservative area?

Education is a huge issue in the Buffalo right now. The waterfront, poverty and economic development are other big issues, although many problems stem from NY State Gov’t. The local Democratic Party dominates city politics. Yet with a large Catholic and working class population, the area has been more socially conservative. Lately it’s exciting to see a group of young progressive leaders emerge. All the positive leadership has been community driven, from the ground up.

Your cartoons take some strong political stands on local issues, so I was curious to know what sort of feedback do you get from the local community. Do you ever get hassled or receive angry emails? Do you feel political cartoons on local issues have more of an influence than on national issues?

I do get lots of feedback. Lots of angry emails and even phone calls. The local cartoons give me a stronger connection to the readers. I feel that good local work is vitally important to both print journalism and preserving full time cartooning jobs. One of the many great things the late Rex Babin contributed to the craft was his emphasis on local.

You’ve been doing some great cartoons against the Republicans and the Republican primaries. Some of my favorites from this year are the ones on April 1, March 23, March 22, March 11 and March 5. Yet you also do some great cartoons critical of Obama (some good ones are the March 31, March 15, and February 15 cartoons). Though I get the impression that you have generally progressive views, you are fair and very incisive in your criticisms of both parties. Would you tell us what your philosophy is on social commentary?

Thanks for the compliment on my recent cartoons. I do hold progressive views on most issues, but I love to target both sides. And I don’t see this as being balanced, just true to what I see to be right and wrong. I try and approach each issue independently, and I let my work be driven by the message.

You did a great blog about a particular cartoon of yours that didn’t get published. The blog gives a great description of your working relationship with your editor and it tells a little bit about the criteria that she uses to decide if a cartoon crosses a line that makes it unpublishable.. The cartoon in question was one where the Republican elephant is nailed to a cross using the “t” in Santorum. What were the readers’ response to this cartoon in your blog? What have been your most controversial cartoons?

I received a positive response to my Santorum cartoon blog post. This may be because most of my conservative critics view my work in print form. I’ve had 3 very controversial cartoons over the past 7 years, and I’ve noticed they have a common denominator: all were tough commentary around a tragic loss of life.

In the past two years, there have been various grassroots movements sprouting up in response to the tough economic times. In the Middle East, there is the Arab Spring. In the American Right, the Tea Party has emerged to influence the Republican Party, while on the Left, the Occupy Wall Street movement has put a spotlight on the economic inequalities in this nation. What are your thoughts on the various people’s movements that seem to be sprouting up?

While it’s inspiring to see all the grassroots movements happening around the world, I don’t think it’s anything new. As a student of history, I believe things are cyclical. Like the fault lines of the earth, there will always be lines of tension between groups of people. Periodic revolutions, civil rights/populist movements pop up to relieve these tensions.

I’m a big fan of your pen and ink art. What is the process that you do in creating a cartoon? What do you do when you want to add color to your art?

It’s great to hear you appreciate my line work. I get rather caught up on detail at times. I’m trying to get myself to loosen up a bit and not control every line. I draw the finished sketches with pigma microns on smooth bristol board. All of the color work I do in Corel Painter, but I feel like I have just scratched the surface with the program. I’m starting to play with the digital watercolor tools and paper settings.

The big topic that I always hear and read about from political cartoonists is the decline of political cartoonists as a profession due to the decline of newspaper circulation. What are your opinions on the viability of political cartooning as a profession?

Like it or not, the fate of professional editorial cartooning is tied to the sustainability of print journalism, and it’s ability to adapt to the web. I do believe newspapers will always be around in some form. The strong ones will survive and adapt, even if they will be smaller and more focused. It’s our job as cartoonists to keep reminding readers and media companies how important we are. I think local work and self-advocacy are the keys to survival.

For your honors thesis, you wrote a paper on the art of the editorial cartoon. What did you wrote specifically in your paper?

For my honors thesis I broke the editorial cartoon into 3 separate parts: the message, the concept and the form. I explored the roles of art and journalism in cartooning and how they applied to each of these parts. Plus it was a great excuse to interview some of my favorite cartoonists…

According to your bio on your website, you’re a native Buffalo resident. For a newcomer to the city, what would you recommend that person see?

Well, Buffalo is such a cool town, and it’s too bad people only think of chicken wings and snow (most of the snow doesn’t even hit the city). The city is redefining itself as a mecca for art and architecture. The Albright Knox is world famous for it’s modern art collection. Dozens of small galleries thrive. My favorite landmark buildings to check out are Frank Lloyd Wright’s Darwin Martin house, Sullivan’s Guarantee Building and Buffalo City Hall. Any visitor should definitely explore the great bars and restaurants in the eclectic Elmwood Village and Allentown (last call 4am!). It’s actually a secret mission of mine to one day bring a cartooning convention here.

A youtube video on how to access articles from the Buffalo News

A youtube video of the city of Buffalo

Here are more interviews that I did for Everyday Citizen

An Interview With Reverand Gerald Britt
An Interview With Cartoonist Tjeerd Royaards
An Interview With Poet, Activist, and Teacher Diane Wahto
An Interview With Cartoonist Jesse Springer
An Interview With Cartoonist Steve Greenberg
An Interview With Eric Wilks
An Interview With Cartoonist Greg Beda
An Interview With Poet Melissa Tuckey
An Interview With Cartoonist Andy Singer
An Interview With Author Robert Balmanno
An Interview With Cartoonist J.P. Jasper
An Interview With Cartoonist David Cohen

An Interview With Cartoonist Monte Wolverton

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — angelolopez @ 12:48 am

The second political cartoonist that I met after Steve Greenberg in the convention of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists two years ago was Monte Wolverton. The son of famed MAD cartoonist Basil Wolverton, Monte was trained at Pasadena’s Art Center College of Design and he also studied editorial photography with Look magazine’s Earl Theison. His cartoons have been published in CB Radio magazine, Creative Computing, CARtoons and Youth Magazine. He did advertising, publication design and illustration work in L.A., Seattle, and Portland, running an innovative design business that produced advertising, corporate images, and comic illustration. In the last 1980s Wolverton was the design director for Plain Truth, a large faith-based publishing concern that produced magazines and promotional materials.

Since the mid 1990s, Monte began doing editorial cartoons for syndication by Cagle cartoons to over 850 publications weekly. His political cartoons also appear weekly in the LA Daily News.

According to your bio, you worked in a small design studio in Southern California in the late 1960s. What was the artistic climate like back then?

In the late 60s through the mid-70s worked in a So Cal studio that was part of a big Christian publishing company — but that didn’t stop us from having fun. The designers and artists there were mostly in their 20s — and we had a network of connections with the local design and art community. As publication designers, we had a huge budget to buy art and photography, so we hired big name illustrators and hung out at LA Society of Illustrators events. There was a lot happening in print — and it was relatively easy for a commercial illustrator or designer to stay busy and pull down some big bucks.
But the underground and alternative artists hadn’t yet been assimilated into the stylistic mainstream. So when you tried something radical and got it into print in a relatively staid publication, you felt like you were really pushing the envelope.

Your father is the legendary cartoonist Basil Wolverton. How did he influence your own cartoons and artwork? What other artists have influenced your work?

When I was maybe 4 or 5 years old I imagined myself being a cartoonist. My dad just encouraged that — built me a little drawing board. I remember him teaching me a few things about lighting and shading — and letting me ink a couple of lines on some stuff he was doing for MAD. In college I became more interested in design and photography than cartooning. I started selling cartoons in the mid-70s — and then quite deliberately emulating my father’s style, because I figured it was the Wolverton style and my father had had a stroke and wasn’t drawing anymore — so someone had to do it. Other influences have been Robert Crumb, Robert Williams and Johnny Hart. I also went back and studied Virgil Finlay, who had influenced my father in terms of his pen technique.

Fifteen years ago, you began to do political cartoons. What got you interested in doing political cartoons? What has been a big influence in your political point of view?

I have Newt Gingrich to thank for getting me into political cartoons. He just bugged me so much with his disproportionate (and, as we later learned, hypocritical) attack on then-President Clinton, that I had to draw something. Which led to me doing a panel every week. I called it the Wolvertoon and created a website around it — originally it was more of a social commentary panel. I was thinking of something like Matt Groening’s Life in Hell for alternative weeklies — but it never really went that direction. Some small newspapers picked it up, and I was sending it off to selected larger papers and weeklies, a few of whom published it occasionally, including the Washington Post. Then my friend Daryl Cagle (who had been doing political cartoons himself) included me in the cartoons he was providing for MSNBC — he encouraged me to turn my panel into a consistently political cartoon. Later, when he started his syndicate, he included me in the group. My political point of view took a long time to develop — my grandmother was a devout Republican and my dad leaded that way. My favorite Uncle Gary (my mom’s brother), however, was a devout Socialist. In the 70s we would have long conversations about socialized health care and other issues. But fundamentally, I think my Christian faith drives my political perspective — to watch out for the little guy, the poor, the elderly, the marginalized. Of course other more conservative Christians come down way differently in their politics, which I understand — but disagree.

Many of your cartoons are critical of corporate power and the austerity proposals of the Republican Party. Several of your cartoons seem sympathetic to the arguments of the Occupy Wall Street movement. What are your thoughts of the Occupy Wall Street movement?

I think it’s about time somebody protested. And early in a social movement, we might expect diversity and and lack of focus. But to be more effective, the movement needs to evolve — to hone down to a few spearhead issues — and hire a good PR firm to help them strategize. Occupy protestors should all be familiar with a key message the group wants to get across — and be able to explain it in a coherent way to anyone who asks. Right now they are so anti-institutional (I understand — I am too) that they are not yet as effective than they could be. Institutions are necessary tools — institutions just have to be managed so they don’t become ends in themselves.

As a Californian, I love a lot of your local cartoons on the state of California. Your cartoons on the Caltrains system, on our tax system and on Jerry Brown and the political situation on Sacramento are priceless. What have been the reactions of your local cartoons? What do you think about the influence of cartoons on local issues as opposed to national issues?

Gee — thanks — I actually don’t get a lot of feedback, because the letters go to the local papers and editors. Politics are local. Probably, local editorial cartoons have a greater effect in influencing local issues than their national counterparts on influencing national issues. I find that sometimes my California/Los Angeles cartoons are less partisan than my national cartoons. I even suffer a few pangs of guilt because I beat up on Jerry once in a while. Yet any feedback I get from the local cartoons still comes from irate conservatives.

One of my favorite cartoons of yours was one you did on October 24, 2011, where you mention all the things a liberal should be proud of. I’ve gotten hassled at times for my liberal views even though I live in the Bay Area. Since Orange County is in the L.A. area, would the political climate there be more conservative that in northern California? Have you gotten any hassles for some of your liberal cartoons?

Oh, yeah. For my national cartoons, I used to get a lot of hate mail and near-death threats. It seemed like a lot of them came from South Carolina. Then there are people who want to engage you in a big argument — actually trying to change your politics. Hey — this is my opinion. If you have an opposing opinion, do a cartoon or a column or something yourself. Letters and emails against cartoons and columns are best addressed to the paper where they become part of the political discourse. Orange county has traditionally been more conservative — and is home to Trinity Broadcasting and other conservative religious groups. But its becoming increasingly urbanized — and conservative values seem to go with rural settings, so I’m thinking that Northern California is a lot more conservative. Similar to rural eastern and southern Oregon and rural eastern Washington. A friend actually went through my Proud to Be a Liberal cartoon point by point, showing how conservatives were instrumental in bringing about the accomplishments I listed. But I didn’t say there weren’t people from both side of the aisle involved in those things — its just that if liberals hadn’t pushed for them, they never would have happened.

You have a wonderful sketchy art style, with lots of line strokes and stipling effects. It looks like you put a lot of work in doing your finished work. What is the process that you go to in making a political cartoon? How long does it take for you to finish your cartoons?

Thanks. It always seems like they take too long. But what the heck! People like ‘em. Okay, maybe I’m the only one who likes em. And maybe my wife. Sometimes. I usually start in the late afternoon by reading the news services and the Buzzflash website to see if anything pops out (for California cartoons I look at the LA Daily News, Sacramento Bee and LA Times). Sometimes my longtime friend, high school teacher and professional songwriter Randy Cate will offer an idea. Sometimes I’ll end up reading the news for hours before I decide on one. Then I start sketching — and some visual approach usually emerges. Then I’ll scan in sketches and sometimes borrow old characters or elements — combine and arrange it all in Photoshop — and arrange the typography in Quark Express. Then I print it out and start inking the final on vellum or tissue. That’s usually about 9 or 10 pm. I usually do that while watching a movie or something. Then I scan that in to Photoshop — clean it up — do any tweakings and adjustments — sometimes add shadings and textures if it still needs it. I save the b/w version (and in the case the the L.A. Daily News, email it to my editor there) — then I resize it and do the color version, often while listening to the Bob Dylan radio show, of which a have a collection of audio files. The next morning I upload both versions to Caglecartoons website. And then it’s done. Longest time, counting research and stewing over ideas — about six hours. Shortest time if an idea pops out fully developed and the art is easy — a couple of hours.

When I read articles about political cartoonists, one of the most frequent topics that I hear is about the future of editorial cartooning. What is your opinion about the future of editorial cartooning? Can it survive as a profession in the internet age?

Editorial cartooning is as vibrant and healthy — and probably more diverse and outspoken — as it has ever been. However — as in the 50s — there are still only a few hundred professional editorial cartoonists in the country. Numbers are not increasing. Yet in the 50s, most of those were employed full time by newspapers. Now I think there are only about 30 or so employed full time — and they have other duties. The majority of editorial cartoonists now have to rely on other sources of income. If this is a problem, I’m part of it because my syndicate provides the highest quality cartoons and columns to publications for a fraction of what a full-time staff cartoonist would cost. Plus, people can now afford to buy good editorial cartoons to illustrate their blogs, e-zines and newsletters. So I think editorial cartoons are here to stay. The business model is just different. Politics is an annoying, grim, serious business dominated by a bunch of egotistical blowhards that take themselves way too seriously. As long as there are those people around (and as long as we have freedom of speech and of the press) there will be cartoonists and pundits to mock them, laugh at them and keep them in their place. Cartoonists and politicians need each other. We both have a societal role to play. It would be nice if we were paid as much as politicians, considering the risks we take by challenging and confronting power.

I looked your fine art pieces on your website and think they’re great and whimsical pieces. I like the youtube videos of your sculpture pieces and I like your textured painting techniques as well. What are your thoughts behind your paintings and sculptures? How do you create your fine arts sculptures?

Thanks again. My fine art has almost always come right out of my subconscious. I use surrealist automatism (an invention of early surrealists, as one might infer) making little sketches of the figures that emerge, preferably when my conscious mind is preoccupied with something else. I scan ‘em in and pick the ones I think are most compelling to realize as sculpture or a painting — and I try not to fool with them too much on the way — I just let them take on an identity of their own and tell me what colors and textures they want to be. Kinda like Steven King’s character-driven writing where his characters essentially seem to write the story for him. My first sculptures were concrete on wire mesh on wooden armature. Now I’m working with wood — carved and painted. Got a show coming up in June at Portland’s Peculiarium.

You’re the President of the Rat Terrier Club of America. Tell us a little about Rat Terriers and the Rat Terriers Club of America.

Kayte and I have been active in the Rat Terrier club for about 13 years. Our main objective during that time has been to get the breed recognized by the American Kennel Club. Right now we have achieved partial recognition with full recognition on the horizon. Kayte and I aren’t dog breeders — we just like these dogs — they’re similar to Jack Russells, except they are a distinctly American breed, and are a bit calmer than Jack Russells. They’re really friendly little guys — unless you’re a rodent.

A youtube video of a Monte Wolverton art exhibition

Youtube videos of sculpture by Monte Wolverton




A youtube video of political cartoonists Jeff Parker, Mike Peters, Monte Wolverton and Cameron” Cam” Cardow.

Here are more interviews that I did for Everyday Citizen

An Interview With Cartoonist Adam Zyglis
An Interview With Reverand Gerald Britt
An Interview With Cartoonist Tjeerd Royaards
An Interview With Poet, Activist, and Teacher Diane Wahto
An Interview With Cartoonist Jesse Springer
An Interview With Cartoonist Steve Greenberg
An Interview With Eric Wilks
An Interview With Cartoonist Greg Beda
An Interview With Poet Melissa Tuckey
An Interview With Cartoonist Andy Singer
An Interview With Author Robert Balmanno
An Interview With Cartoonist J.P. Jasper
An Interview With Cartoonist David Cohen

Theme: Banana Smoothie. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.